期刊文献+

美国严重认知障碍儿童的选择性评价 被引量:3

The Alternate Assessment of Children with Severe Cognitive Disabilities in the U.S.
原文传递
导出
摘要 在美国,不能参加统一绩效测验的严重认知障碍儿童需要接受选择性评价。本文主要介绍了美国严重认知障碍儿童选择性评价的法律依据、评价标准、评价形式等基本情况。文章还讨论了选择性评价的积极影响及面临的问题,展望了今后的研究趋势。 In the U.S.,children with severe cognitive disabilities who are unable to take the general accountability test are supposed to be given an alternate assessment.This article gives an introduction to the legal basis,the evaluation criteria,and the evaluation methods for the alternate assessment of children with severe cognitive disabilities in the U.S.Also,the article analyzes the positive impact of the alternate assessment and pending problems,and predicts the future trend of the research.
作者 于素红
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期42-46,共5页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
关键词 严重认知障碍 选择性评价 severe cognitive disability alternate assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1US Department of Education. Alternate achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities., non-regulatory guidance, www. ed. gov/policy/elsec/guid/altguidance. 2005-12-25.
  • 2Cortiella C, Wickham D. Students with sig nificant cognitive disabilities and standards-based curriculum: why now? why not? www. eparent. corn/ EP MAGAZINE, 2008, (9). 89--92.
  • 3Roeber E. Setting standards on alternate assessments (Synthesis Report 42). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. http://education, umn. edu/ NCEO/OnlinePubs/Syntbesis42. btml. 2005-11-28.
  • 4Towles-Reeves E, Harold K, Muhomba M. Alternate assessment., have we learned anything new? Exceptional Children, 2009, 75(2). 233-252.
  • 5Tbompson S, Johnstone C, Thurlow M, et al. 2005 State special education outcomes, steps forward in a decade of change. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. http://www, education, umn. edu/ nceo/ OnlinePubs/ 2005State Report. btm,2005-12-12.
  • 6Browder D M, Flowers C, Ahlgrim-Delzell L, et al. The alignment of alternate assessment content with academic and functional curricula. Journal of Special Education, 2004, 37:211-223.
  • 7Ysseldyke J, Dennison A, Nelson R. Large-scale assessment and accountability systems: Positive consequences for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 51 ). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes, http://education, umn. edu/NGEO/On- linePubs/Synthesis51, html, 2005-9-27.
  • 8Roach A, Elliott S. The influences of access to general education curriculum on alternate assessment performance of students with significant cognitive disabilities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2006, 28(2). 181-194.
  • 9Frieden L, Chairperson. Improving Educational Outcomes for Students with Disabilities. http.// www. ncd. gov/newsroom/publications/2004/edu- cationoutcomes, htm, 2004-5-17.
  • 10Stephen N E, Andrew T R. Alternate assessments of students with significant disabilities: alternative approaches, common technical challenges. Applied Measurement in Education, 2007, 20(3) : 301-333.

同被引文献27

  • 1钱丽霞,江小英.对我国随班就读发展现状评价的问卷调查报告[J].中国特殊教育,2004(5):1-5. 被引量:45
  • 2沈云交.什么是质量[J].世界标准化与质量管理,2005(8):16-18. 被引量:3
  • 3Goodman J F, Bond L. The individualized educa- tion program: a retrospective critique. The Journal of Special Education, 1993, 26(4) :408 - 422.
  • 4Mitchell L Y , David R, Elisabeth L R. The legal his- tory of special education: what a long, strange trip it' s been. Remedial and Special Education, 1998, 19(4): 219 - 228.
  • 5Keogh B K. Celebrating PL 94 - 142: the Education of All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. Issues in Teacher Education, 2007, 16(2) :65 - 69.
  • 6Smith S W. Individualized education programs (IEPs) in special education - from intent to acquiescence. Ex- ceptional Children, 1990, 57(1 ) :6 - 14.
  • 7Rodger, Sylvia. Individual education plans revisited: a re- view of the literature. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1995, 42(3):221 - 239.
  • 8Karger J. Access to the general curriculum for stu- dents with disabilities: the role of the IEP. National Center On Accessing the General Curriculum, U.S., 20O4.
  • 9Margolis H, Truesdell L A. Do special education teach- ers use IEPs to guide instruction? The Urban Review, 1987,19(3) : 151 - 159.
  • 10Huefner D S. The risks and opportunities of the IEP requirements under IDEA 97. The Joumal of Special Education, 2000, 33(4) : 195 - 204.

引证文献3

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部