期刊文献+

七氟醚吸入麻醉和瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚静脉麻醉用于小儿手术的临床观察 被引量:5

Clinical Observation of Sevoflurane Inhalation and Remifentanil Combined with Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Pediatric Operation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较七氟醚吸入麻醉和丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼静脉麻醉用于小儿手术的临床效果。方法:100例1~8岁的患儿随机分为丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼组(A组)与七氟醚吸入组(B组)。麻醉诱导后,A组持续输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼维持麻醉,B组吸入七氟醚维持麻醉。术中根据生命体征调整丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼的输注速度及七氟醚的吸入浓度,记录术中循环变化、术后麻醉恢复情况。结果:与B组相比,A组术中MAP下降明显(P<0.05)。结论:与A组相比,B组术中生命体征控制平稳;术后清醒迅速、完全、平稳,拔管时间无明显差异。 Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of sevoflurane inhalation and remifentanil combined with propofol total intravenous anesthesia in pediatric operation.Methods: One hundred patients aged from 1 to 8 years old were randomly divided into two groups,group A with recombined with propofol TIVA and group B with sevoflurane inhalation.They were 50 patients respectively.After induction of anesthesia,group A with continuous infusing proplfol and remifentail maintentant anesthesia,group B with inhaling sevoflurane.According to life indexes adjusted the infusing speed of propofol and remifentanil and the inhalation desity of sevoflurane during operation,also the variations of circulation during operation and the recover condition of anesthesia after operation were recorded.Results: During operation,MAP was significantly different in group A than that in group B(P〈0.05).Conclusion: There was more stable life sign during operation in group B than that in group A,also rapidlier,completer,clear-headed.
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2010年第1期69-70,共2页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 七氟醚 吸入麻醉 丙泊酚 瑞芬太尼 静脉麻醉 sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia propofol remifentanil total intravenous anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1Hurford WE, Bailin MT, Davison JK, Clinical anesthesia procedures of the Massachusetts General Hospital. 6th ed. Philadephia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002. 165-166.
  • 2Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg, 1999, 89(4 Suppl):S7-14.
  • 3Vuyk J, Mertens M J, Olofsen E, et al. Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection: determination of optimal EC50-EC90 propofal-opioid concentrations that assure adequate anesthesia and a rapid return of consciousness. Anesthesiology, 1997, 87: 1549
  • 4Vuyk J, Engbers FH, Burm AG, et al. Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and alfentanil when given for induction of anesthesia.Anesthesiology, 1996, 84: 288-299.
  • 5Smith C, McEwan AI, Jhaveri R, et al. The interaction of fentanyl on the Cp50 of propofol for loss of consciousness and skin incision.Anesthesiology, 1994, 81: 820-828.
  • 6V uyk J, Engbers FH, Lemmens HJ, et al. Pharmacodynamics of propofol in female patients. Anesthesiology, 1992, 77: 3-9.
  • 7Vuyk J, Lim T, Engber FH, et al. The pharmacodynamic interaction of propofol and alfentanil during lower abdominal surgery in women.Anesthesiology, 1995, 83: 8-22.
  • 8Thompson JP, Hall AP, Russell J, et al. Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth, 1998,80: 467-469.
  • 9Schuttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H, et al. A comparison of remifcntanil and alfcntanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.Anaesthesia, 1997,52: 307-317.
  • 10Hogue CW, Bowdle TA, O'Leary C, et al. A multiconter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg, 1996,83:279-285.

共引文献354

同被引文献26

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部