家庭友好实践、人格特质对工作家庭冲突的影响被引量：13

The Effects of Family-friendly Practices and Personality on Work-family Conflict

导出

摘要本文以全国1868名企业经理人为对象,采用问卷法,考察了家庭友好实践、人格特质对工作家庭冲突双方向三种形式(基于时间、基于压力和基于行为)共六类冲突的影响。结果表明:组织的"政策友好"、"上司友好"和"文化友好"均对工作家庭冲突总体具有显著作用。具体而言,政策友好可显著降低TWIF、SWIF和总WIF;上司友好对基于时间和基于压力的四种冲突的效应均显著,对两种总体冲突的效应也显著;文化友好则对所有子类和总类的冲突影响均显著。此外发现,尽责性对FIW具有显著的负向作用;神经质对六类冲突及总WIF和总FIW均具有显著正向作用。同时,考察两类人格特质和三种家庭友好实践对上述各类WFC的影响发现,"文化友好"和"神经质"最具预测力。 Based on the questionnaire data collected nationwide from 1,868 managers,this study examined the effects of family-friendly practices and personality on work-family conflict which included two directions and three forms,totally six types of conflicts.Family-friendly policies,family-friendly supervisors and family-friendly culture were found to have significant effects on the general work-family conflict.Specifically speaking,friendly policies had significant negative effects on TWIF,SWIF and WIF;friendly supervisors had significant negative effects on all types of conflicts which are time-based and stress-based,on WIF and FIW;friendly culture had significant negative effects on all types of conflicts.Conscientiousness was found to have significant negative effects on FIW.Neuroticism was found to have significant positive effects on all six types of conflict,total WIF and FIW.Examining the effects of two kinds of personality traits and three types of family-friendly practices simultaneously,this study found that friendly culture and neuroticism were the most powerful predictors.

作者刘玉新张建卫

机构地区对外经济贸易大学国际商学院北京理工大学管理与经济学院

出处《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期99-109,共11页 China Industrial Economics

基金国家自然科学基金项目"高层管理者工作-家庭冲突与应对方式研究"(批准号70672061) 北京理工大学基础研究基金项目"企业高层管理者主观幸福感及其影响因素研究"(批准号20070842004)

关键词尽责性神经质家庭友好实践工作—家庭冲突家庭—工作冲突 conscientiousness neuroticism family-friendly practices work-interference-family family-interference-work

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1Allen, T. D., & Russell, J. E. A. Parental Leave of Absence: Some Not So Family Friendly Implications [J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1999, (29).
2Aryee S., Fields D.,& Luk. V. A Cross-cultural Test of a Model of the Work-Family Interface [J]. Journal of Management, 1999, (25).
3Caldwell, D. F., & O'Reilly, C. A. III. Measuring Person-job Fit with a Profile-comparison Process[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, (75).
4Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. Construction and Initial Validation of a Multidimensional Measure of Work-family Conflict [J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2000, (56).
5Clifton, T. J., & Edward Shepard. Work and Family Programs and Productivity [J]. International Journal of Manpower, 2004, 25 (8).
6Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual[M]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.,1992.
7Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior [M]. New York: Plenum, 1985.
8Eaton, S.C. If You Can Use Them: Flexibility Policies, Organizational Commitment, and Perceived Performance [J]. Industrial Relations, 2003, 42(2).
9Eby,L.T., Casper,W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C.,& Brinley,A. Work and Family Research in IO/OB: Content Analysis and Review of the Literature (1980-2002)[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2005, (66).
10Greenhaus, J. H.,& Beutell, N. J. Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1985,(10).

二级参考文献59

1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1～10
2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588～ 606
4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238～ 246
5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247～ 255
6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315～ 353
7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136～ 162
8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424～ 453
10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1～ 55