期刊文献+

奥沙拉嗪与柳氮磺吡啶治疗溃疡性结肠炎疗效与安全性的系统评价 被引量:14

Systematic Review on Safety and Efficacy of Olsalazine and Sulfasalazine in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价氨基水杨酸制剂奥沙拉嗪与柳氮磺吡啶对比治疗溃疡性结肠炎的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane library、Embase、SCI、CNKI、万方、维普、CBM数据库。按Cochrane系统评价的方法评价所纳入研究资料质量,并进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入12个随机对照试验(RCT),共1294例溃疡性结肠炎患者。Meta分析结果显示,奥沙拉嗪治疗溃疡性结肠炎在总有效率、复发率方面与柳氮磺吡啶比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在安全性评价方面,11个RCT比较了二者的不良反应,提示二者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:奥沙拉嗪在疗效和安全性方面并不优于柳氮磺吡啶。 OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy and safety of olsalazine vs.sulphasalazine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.METHODS:By Retrieving from PubMed,Cochrane library,SCI,CNKI,Wanfang,VIP and CBM,randomized controlled trials were collected and the quality of RCTs were evaluated using Cochrane systematic review.Meta-analysis of RCTs was performed.RESULTS:12 RCTs were included in this study,with a total of 1294 patients.Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical significance in the total effective rate,relapse rate between two preparations(P0.05).11 RCTs were enrolled in comparison of ADR.There was no statistical significance between 2 preparations(P0.05).CONCLUSION:The analysis shows that there is no significant difference in the efficacy and safety between olsalazine and sulphasalazine.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第20期1899-1902,共4页 China Pharmacy
关键词 溃疡性结肠炎 奥沙拉嗪 有效性 不良反应 系统评价 Ulcerative colitis Olsalazine Effetiveness ADR Systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1陆再英,钟南山,主编.内科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:778-779.
  • 2江学良.重视溃疡性结肠炎的维持治疗[J].世界华人消化杂志,2005,13(1):1-5. 被引量:23
  • 3谭启文.溃疡性结肠炎的药物治疗[J].内科,2009,4(4):610-612. 被引量:9
  • 4Kruis W, Judmaier G, Kayasseh L, etal. Double-blind dose-finding study of olsalazine versus sulphasalazine as maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis[J]. Eur J GastroenterologyHepatol, 1995, 7(5): 391.
  • 5Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook.for Systematic Reviews oflnterventions Version 5.0.1 [M]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
  • 6Jewell DP, Ireland A. Controlled trial comparing olsalazine and sulphasalazine for maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology[J]. Supplement, 1988, 23(148) : 45.
  • 7Willoughby CP, Cowan RE, Gould SR, et al. Double-blind comparison of olsalazine and sulphasalazine in active ulcerative colitis. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology [J]. Supplement, 1988, 23(148) :40.
  • 8Rao SS, Dundas SA, Holdsworth CD, et al. Olsalazine or sulphasalazine in first attacks of ulcerative colitis? A dou- ble blind study[J]. Gut, 1989, 30(5) : 675.
  • 9Kiilerich S, Ladefoged K, Rannem T, et al. Prophylactic effects of olsalazine v sulphasalazine during 12 months maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis[J]. Gut, 1992, 33(2):252.
  • 10Rijk MC, Van LH, Van TJ. Relapse-preventing effect and safety of sulfasalazine and olsalazine in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission: a prospective, doubleblind, randomized multicenter study[J]. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 1992, 87(4) : 438.

二级参考文献34

共引文献617

同被引文献186

引证文献14

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部