期刊文献+

植被恢复土壤抗蚀性响应及其评价研究 被引量:4

Soil Anti-erodibility and Assessment of Different Vegetation Restoration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以农地为对照,对黄土高原西部地区陕西千阳天然次生林侧柏(B),20年(C20)和5年(C5)生刺槐林,撂荒5年(H5)、苜蓿草地(M)5种不同植被恢复模式土壤结构特性及抗蚀性进行研究。结果表明,与对照相比,不同植被恢复模式土壤结构系数、土壤有机质含量、水稳性团聚体含量提高。以模糊隶属度函数模型对研究区域抗蚀性定量评价,不同植被类型土壤抗蚀性指数分别为:侧柏0.92,20年刺槐0.82,5年刺槐0.62,5年撂荒地0.49,苜蓿0.46,农地0.20。土壤抗蚀性大小顺序为:侧柏>刺槐20>刺槐5>荒5>苜蓿>农地。通过不同的植被恢复,土壤抗蚀性比对照有了明显提高,土壤生态功能得到改善。 Soil anti-erodibility under five vegetation restoration types including Platycladus orientalis(B), 20-year Robinia pseudoacacia(C20), 5-year Robinia pseudoacacia(C5), 5-year abandoned land(H5), Medicago safiva (M) were studied in Qianyang County of Shaanxi Province which in the western Loss Plateau, a farmland was taken as control. The results showed that soil anti-erodibility was improved obviously compared to farmland. Soil organic matter content, water-stable aggregates content, aggregate degrees, structure coefficient increased significantly, while dispersion ratio and percentage of destroyed structure decreased. Soil organic matter content, water-stable aggregates content, aggregate degree and dispersion coefficient were used to evaluate the soil anti-erodibility quantitatively. The order of anti-erodibility with different vegetation restoration types was: B〉C20〉C5〉H5〉M. In a word, soil anti-erodibility under restored vegetation is better than that under farmland.
出处 《农业现代化研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期352-355,共4页 Research of Agricultural Modernization
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:30971695) 农业部作物需水与调控重点开放实验室开放课题(编号:CWRR200906) 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(编号:0032010043)
关键词 土壤侵蚀 抗蚀性 植被恢复 评价 soil erosion anti-erodibility vegetation restoration assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献178

共引文献539

同被引文献77

引证文献4

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部