期刊文献+

西酞普兰与万拉法新治疗抑郁症的循证药物经济学评价 被引量:2

Evidence-based evaluation on cost-effectiveness of citalopram and venlafaxine in the treatment of depressive disorder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价西酞普兰与万拉法新治疗抑郁症的成本与效果。方法采用循证医学方法收集西酞普兰与万拉法新治疗抑郁症的临床资料,应用药物经济学的成本-效果分析法进行分析。结果西酞普兰与万拉法新治疗抑郁症的治愈率分别为41.11%、52.22%(P>0.05);成本-效果比分别为1425.13、2037.34。结论西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的成果-效果优于万拉法新。 Aim To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of citalopram and venlafaxine in the treatment of depressive disorders.Methods The clinical data of citalopram and venlafaxine in the treatment of depressive disorders were collected by evidence-based medicine method and were evaluated with cost-effectiveness analysis.Rusults The curative rates of citalopram and venlafaxine were 41.11% and 52.22%(P〉0.05),respectively,and the corresponding cost-effectiveness ratios were 1425.13 and 2037.34.Conclusion The cost-effectiveness of citalopram is superior to venlafaxine in the treatment of depressive disorders.
作者 杜彪
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2010年第6期737-738,共2页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 重庆市科技攻关项目(NoCSTC2009AC5195) 重庆市万州区科学技术项目(No2006607)
关键词 循证药物经济学 西酞普兰 万拉法新 抑郁症 成本-效果分析 evidence-based pharmacoecomics citalopram venlafaxine depressive disorder cost-effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献59

共引文献57

同被引文献31

  • 1向倩,崔一民,周颖.国外临床药学服务的经济学评价文献综述[J].中国药物经济学,2013,8(S3):15-18. 被引量:6
  • 2Murray C J,Vos T,Lozano R,et al.Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions,1990-2010:a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010[J].Lancet,2012,380(9859):2197-2223.
  • 3Al-Harbi KS.Treatment-resistant depression:therapeutic trends,challenges,and future directions[J].Patient Prefer Adherence,2012,6:369-388.
  • 4Fang Y,Yuan C,Xu Y,et al.Comparisons of the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release venlafaxine,rnirtazapine,and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression:a double-blind,randomized pilot study in a Chinese population[J].J Clin Psychopharmacol,2010,30(4):357-364.
  • 5Lepine BA,Moreno RA,Campos RN,et al.Treatment-resistant depression increases health costs and resource utilization[J].Rev Bras Psiquiatr,2012,34(4):379-388.
  • 6Thase ME,Rush AJ.When at first you don't succeed:sequential strategies for antidepressant nonresponders[J].J Clin Psychiatry,1997,58(suppl 13):23-29.
  • 7Jain R.Single-action versus dual-action antidepressants[J].Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry,2004,6(Suppl 1):7-11.
  • 8Nemeroff CB,Entsuah R,Benattia I,et al.Comprehensive analysis of remission (COMPARE) with venlafaxine versus SSRIs[J].Biol Psychiatry,2008,63(4):424-434.
  • 9Watanabe N,Omori IM,Nakagawa A,et al.Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2011,(12):CD006528.
  • 10Zimovetz EA,Wolowacz SE,Classi PM,et al.Methodologies used in cost-effectiveness models for evaluating treatments in major depressive disorder:a systematic review[J].Cost Eff Resour Alloc,2012,10(1):1.

引证文献2

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部