期刊文献+

高血压性脑出血碎吸与开颅治疗比较 被引量:3

Intracranial breaking and drainaging of hematoma or removal through craniotomy in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对高血压性脑出血采用钻颅碎吸与开颅两种治疗方法的近期与远期疗效比较。方法:97例随机分组,采用CT定位、颅内碎吸与传统开颅清除血肿。术后随访3~12个月。结果:碎吸组与开颅组在降低病死率和提高远期生存质量方面,差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:首选碎吸治疗高血压性脑出血,不一定要行开颅术。 Objective:To compare the immediate and nemote effects of intracranial breaking and drainaging hematoma with that of surgical removal through craniotomy in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Methods:97 cases were divided randomly into two groups:one group treated with intracranial breaking and drainaging of hematomas and another group by traditional craniotomy with the localization by CT.All patients were followed up from 3 to 12 months after surgical manipulation.Results:The difference in decreasing of fatality rate and improving in nemote effect in survival quality between the two groups was not significant( P >0.05).Conclusions:Intracranial breaking and drainaging of hematoma should be first of choice in treating the hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 1999年第1期21-22,共2页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
关键词 脑出血 高血压 并发症 外科手术 cerebral hemorrhage hypertention intracranial breaking and drainaging of hematomas craniotomy
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献8

共引文献33312

同被引文献6

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部