世界遗产保护的地方视角——以武夷山的城村为例被引量：13

Local Perspective of World Heritage Conservation:A Case Study of Chengcun

导出

摘要从现实来看,遗产与旅游关系密切。其一,遗产的潜在价值将是最直接的旅游资源,这可从蜂拥而至的大众旅游看出;其二,遗产旅游的独特性可能会使规划者依据需要选择遗产地的一些文化特质,一方面适应于全球化的模式需要,另一方面则凸显其地方文化特色。这一观点呈现出遗产地村落面临遗产旅游而可能发生的两种现象:"去地方化"与"再地方化"。本文将以武夷山城村古村落为个案,在重新审视世界遗产保护模式的基础上,考察村落共同体在遗产保护中的文化变迁与调适,以期说明"去地方化"和"再地方化"现象是地方(村落、民众等)应对当下遗产运动所做出的"表述",由此强调遗产的地方性主体的"文化自觉"对遗产保护的重要意义。 There are close relations between heritage and tourism.. On the one hand,the potential value of heritage is the direct tourism resource, on the other,the uniqueness of heritage tourism may lead the planners to choose some cultural features of the heritage site, which can not only meet the global pattern, but also highlight local cultural traits. In that case, two possible phenomena will be brought out： de-localization and re-localization. This essay,taking Chengcun as a case, re-examines its heritage conservation mode, inspects the cultural change and cultural adaptation of village community in heritage conservation, in order to illustrate that the phenomenon of de-localization and re -localization is a local statement of the current heritage movement, and to emphasize the importance of the cultural consciousness of local stakeholders in the heritage conservation.

作者龚坚

机构地区厦门大学人类学与民族学系

出处《东南文化》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期15-19,共5页 Southeast Culture

关键词遗产保护去地方化再地方化 heritage conservation de-localization re-localization

分类号 K878.3 [历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1[德]尤尔根·哈贝马斯著刘北成曹卫东译.《合法化危机》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年12月版.第1-12页.
2[法]皮埃尔·布尔迪厄著,蒋梓骅译.《实践感》,译林出版社,2003年.
3Peter Howard. Heritage Management, Interpretation, Identity. London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.2003, p.43,pp45-48.
4彭兆荣.现代旅游中家园遗产的生态链——广西秀水村旅游开发潜伏的危机[J].广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2007,29(1):16-23. 被引量：11
5Bart J.M.van der Aa,Peter D.Groote & Paulus P.P.Huigen, World Heritage as NIMBY? The Case of the Dutch Part of the Wadden Sea. In D-Harrison & M-Hitchcock(eds.), The Politics of World Heritage.Clevedon/Buffalo/Toronto: Channel View Publications. 2005, p.11, pp.7-8.
6Domanico, L. The Invisible Landscape: Subsoil, Environment and the Italian Legislation on the Culture Heritage. In European Journal of Archaeology. Vol. 2, No. 2. 1999, pp.159- 175.
7[英]戴伦·J·蒂莫西,斯蒂芬·W·博伊德著,程尽能主译.《遗产旅游》,旅游教育出版社,2007年,第11,125-126页.
8《读史方舆纪要》卷九七《福建》三.
9民国《建阳县志》.
10李文睿.《“风水设计”与“地方性“生态设计的结合》,2006年.

二级参考文献18

1[2]费孝通.乡土社会生育制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
2[1]Anderson,B.1991.Imagined Communities:Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism[M].London:Verso Press.
3[2]Barth,F.1969.Ethnic Groups and Boundaries[M].Boston:Little,Brown and Company.
4[3]Boniface,P.& Fowler,P.1993.Heritage and Tourism in "the global village"[M].London and New York:Routledge.
5[4]Daher,R.F.2000.Dismantling a community's heritage.In Robinson,M etc.(ed.) Tourism and Heritage Relationships:Global,National and Local Perspectives[Z].Gateshead:Athenaeum Press.
6[5]Farber,B.1971.Kinship and Class:A Midwestern Study[M].New York:Basic books.
7[6]Geertz,C.1963.Agricultural Involution[M].Berkeley:University of California Press.
8[7]Graburn,H.N.2001.Learning to Consume:What is Heritage and When is it Tradition? In AlSayyad,N.(ed.) Consuming Tradition,Manufacturing Heritage[M].London:Routledge.
9[8]Hewison,R.1989.Heritage:An Interpretation.In Uzzell,D.L.(ed.) Heritage Interpretation.Vol/ I The Natural and Built Environment[M].London & New York:Belhaven Press.
10[9]Hobsbawm,E.1983.The Invention of Tradition[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.