期刊文献+

从法制史的立场来看中华人民共和国刑法--对滋贺秀三《从法制史的立场来看现代中国的刑事立法》的介绍及补论 被引量:2

PRC’s Criminal Law at the Standpoint of the History of Legal System——Introduction and Complement of SHIGA,shuzo
下载PDF
导出
摘要 滋贺秀三(日)1983年论文指出从1979年刑法中可以看出与律相似之处。滋贺所提观点虽有不足,但除了在1997年刑法取消比照以外,时至今日基本上他的看法是妥当的。不过,关于量刑(滋贺认为因刑法典有量刑制度,故属于近代刑法典)在更紧缩刑的幅度的方向,刑法条文自身以及其后的司法解释所确定的基准等方面,尽管与所谓的律的客观性数值主义的制度迥然不同,但是在制定精确的基准这一点上,可以看到一定的类似性。 SHIGA, Shuzo pointed out that there were some similarities between traditional penal code and Criminal Law of PRC in his essay in 1983. This paper tries to give some supplementary explanations with a further study on Criminal Law 1997. Except for abolition of analogy in 1997, what Shiga said is still appropriate, but we can find another similarity in terms of devise of the accurate criterion, though Chinese Criminal Law has different direction in narrowing the range of criminal sentence (Shiga pointed out that Criminal Law of PRC belonged to modern criminal law because it had the range of sentence.), and different items and criterion set by the following legal explanation from the objective numerical institution of the law.
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期6-11,共6页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 刑法史 量刑 刑法 history of legal system sentence criminal law
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[日]滋贺秀三.《中国法制史论集·法典与刑罚》,东京:创文社2003年版.
  • 2[日]高见泽磨.《规范与统合》,载《系列:向世界史发出的询问·第5卷》,东京:岩波书店1990年版.
  • 3高见泽磨.Leagal Troubles and Their Resolution in China : the Interaction of Shuolizhe and Xinfuzhe , International Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 3, part2, 2006, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 4[日]木问正道、铃木贤,高见泽磨,宇田川幸.《现代中国法入门》,东京:有斐阁2009年版(高见泽执笔部分).

同被引文献29

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部