摘要
《中华人民共和国合同法》及相关司法解释创设了代位权人的直接受偿权。该权利是以代位权人与次债务人存在直接的债之法律关系为前提条件的,从"代位"二字的法律内涵、法律规范分析及立法目的诸角度考量,该前提条件的满足是通过债权的法定让与实现的。代位权人直接受偿并不违背债权平等原则。代位权人直接受偿权的确立,使得我国代位权制度之设计目的已不在于债之保全,而是为了达到直接清偿代位权人的债权之法律效果。换言之,借助于债权的法定让与,代位权已成为一种直接的债权回收手段。
Subrogator's right to discharge directly,based on the legal relation between a creditor and sub-debtor,was provided first in the Law of the People's Republic of China on Contracts and related judicial interpretations.According to the legal implication subrogation analyses of relevant legal norm and legislative purpose,the direct discharge as the precondition of subrogation is satisfied by the legal assignment of creditor's right.Subrogator's right to discharge directly does not violate the claim on the principle of equality.With the legal establishment of the subrogator's right to discharge directly,the purpose of subrogation system formulated is not for the preservation of obligatory right but for the legal effect of subrogator's right to discharge directly.In other words,nowadays the subrogation has been a direct way to reclaim bad creditor's right.
出处
《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期246-250,共5页
Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
关键词
代位权
直接受偿权
债权的法定让与
subrogation right
direct discharge
legal assignment of creditor's right