摘要
通过对77份听写测试试卷采用三种评分方法(单词评分法、单词+意义评分法、意块评分法)评判出的分数进行相关性比较和分析,以深入研究这三种评分方法的信度和效度。数据比较和对实验量表的分析表明:(1)三种评分方法导致了不同的听写成绩;但显著性差异不强;(2)三种评分方法都实用,且前两种评分法比第三种评分法对受试获得理想的成绩更有帮助。(3)评分者在评分过程中严谨度一致,三种评分方法都适合于本实验且高度相关。整个实验有很高的信度和效度。
The main object of this research was to investigate the reliability and validity of three scoring methods（＂exact word scoring＂,＂exact word plus sentence meaning scoring＂,and the ＂semantic chunk scoring＂） in dictation test.Discussion of the results revealed three main findings.First,the three methods led to significantly different dictation test scores,but the differences were not strong.Second,all the three scoring methods were practical for the dictation assessment with methods one and two a little bit better than method three.Third,the three raters were consistent in their rating;and the three methods were fit for this test and achieved high correlation with each other.The whole research was proved to be reliable and valid.
关键词
听写测试
单词评分法
单词+意义评分法
意块评分法
相关性
信度
效度
dictation assessment
exact word scoring method
exact word plus sentence meaning scoring method
chunk scoring method
relativity
reliability
validity
