期刊文献+

不同钠浓度透析模式对血液透析患者急性并发症的影响 被引量:2

The effect study on choosing different concentrations of sodium dialysis mode on the acute complicationson
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察3种不同钠离子浓度的透析模式对血液透析(HD)患者低血压(IDH)、肌肉痉挛等急性并发症的影响。方法选择既往HD中反复发生IDH的患者30例,采用随机单盲自身对照设计,每位患者分别接受常规透析(A组)、低温可调钠+超滤曲线(UP1)(B组)、低温高钠(C组)模式,各进行HD10例次。观察透析中IDH及肌肉痉挛症状出现的次数和护理干预次数。结果 B组和C组急性并发症发生率和护理干预发生率明显少于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论低温高钠透析模式可有效地降低透析中急性并发症的发生率,而高钠透析更可增加患者透析耐受性。 Objective To observed dialysis mode of three different patterns of sodium ion to impact of hemodialysis (HD) patients with hypotension (IDH), muscle cramps and other acute complications. Methods 30 HD recurrent IDH pa- tients used self-controlled randomized single-blind design, each patient respectively received conventional dialysis( A Group), low sodium + UF curves ( UP1 ) ( B Group), low high-sodium ( C group) mode, all for HD 10 case-times. And observed symptoms of patients with muscle spasm frequency and the number of nursing intervention. Results Acute complication rate and the nursing intervention rate in B group and C group were significantly less than those of A group, the difference were significant (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Low temperature and high sodium dialysis can effectively reduce rate of the occurrence of acute complications. The high-sodium dialysis can increase tolerance of the patients.
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2010年第10期23-24,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词 低温 钠浓度 超滤曲线 急性并发症 Low temperature Sodium concentration Ultrafihration curve Acute complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘虹,刘伏友,彭佑铭,朱健玲,李军,陈星.可调钠血液透析对透析低血压的预防作用[J].中国血液净化,2002,1(8):21-23. 被引量:123
  • 2[13]Fine A, Penner B. The protective effect of cool dialysate is dependent on patients' predialysis temperature. Am J Kidney Dis, 1996, 28(2):262-265
  • 3[1]Henrich WL. Hemodynamic instability during hemodialysis. Kidney Int,1986,30(4):605-612
  • 4[2]De Vries JP, Kouw PM, van der Meer NJ, et al. Non-invasive monitoringof blood volume during hemodialysis: its relation with post-dialytic dry weight. Kidney Int,1993,44(4):851-853
  • 5[3]Ligtenberg G, Blankestijn PJ, Koomans H. Hemodynamic response during lower body negative pressure: role of volume status. J Am Soc Nephrol,1998,9:105-113
  • 6[4]Van Kuijk WH, Luik AJ, de Leeuw PW, et al. Vascular reactivity during hemodialysis and isolated ultrafiltration: thermal influences. Nephrol Dial Transplant,1995,10(10):1852-1858
  • 7[5]Schneditz D, Martin K, Kramer M, et al. Effect of controlled extracorporeal blood cooling on ultrafiltration-induced blood volume changes during hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1997,8:956-964
  • 8[6]Daugirdas JT. Dialysis hypotension: A hemodynamic analysis. Kidney Int,1991,39:233-246
  • 9[7]Jost CM, Agarwal R, Khair-el-Din T, et al. Effects of cooler temperature dialysate on hemodynamic stability in "problem" dialysis patients. Kidney Int,1993,44(3):606-612
  • 10[8]Poldermans D, Man in't veld AJ, Rembaldi R, et al. Cardiac evaluation in hypotension-prone and hypotension-resistant hemodialysis patient. Kindey Int,1999,56(5):1905-1911

共引文献136

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部