期刊文献+

一串红株型突变体AFLP分析 被引量:6

AFLP Analysis on the Plant-type Mutants of Salvia splendens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一串红(Salvia splendens)株型突变体BN35-1分枝能力强,不必摘心,株型自然成球。本研究利用AFLP(amplified fragment length polymorphism)分子标记技术对其进行分析。从21对引物组合中筛选出6对多态性高的引物组合对突变体BN35-1、野生型BN35及4个商品种进行亲缘关系分析以确定BN35-1与BN35亲缘关系。另外用21对供试引物组合单独对突变体及原种进行多态性分析以寻找差异条带。结果表明,BN35-1与BN35亲缘关系最近,相似系数为0.986 1,远高于其他商品种、BN35与商品种以及商品种间的相似性。在21对供试引物组合中,12对引物检测出BN35-1与BN35基因组DNA共52处基因座位位点存在差异,相应的特异条带是控制株型突变或与控制株型突变基因相连锁的侯选基因片段,深入研究工作有待进一步进行。 Plant-type mutants BN35-1 of Salvia splendens had high ramifications. They became ball-plant type without disbudding until maturate. The AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) analysis was conducted in the study. To analyze relationship between BN35-1 and BN35, 6 pairs of primers combi- nation were selected from 21 pairs of primers combination to amplify plant-type mutants BN35-1, wild-tupe strain BN35 and 4 cultivars of S. splendens. Then 21 pairs of primers combination were used to amplify dif- ferent band patterns just between BN35-1 and BN35. The results showed that BN35-1 and BN35 had a higher similarity than that of other two cultivars (strain), and the similarity coefficient was 0. 986 1. 12 pairs of primers combination from 21 pairs of primers combination amplified 49 polymorphic bands between BN35-1 and BN35. All of polymorphic bands should be treated as candidate gene segments which eontroled the plant-type mutation or linkage with it.
出处 《北京农学院学报》 2010年第2期1-4,共4页 Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture
基金 北京市教育委员会项目(KM200910020014)
关键词 一串红 株型突变体 AFLP分子标记 多态性 亲缘关系 Salvia splendens Plant-type Mutant AFLP Molecular Marker Polymorphism Genetic relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1董爱香,郝宝刚,张西西,张华丽.5个一串红品种耐热性鉴定[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(4):265-269. 被引量:14
  • 2王斌,翁曼丽.AFLP的原理及其应用[J].杂交水稻,1996,11(5):27-30. 被引量:68
  • 3陈启亮,李清国,田瑞,张青林.AFLP标记及其在园艺植物遗传育种中的应用[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2005,2(2):19-24. 被引量:13
  • 4Zhang L H,Ozias-Akins P,Kochert G,et al.Differentiation of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) genotypes by AFLP analyses[J].Theor Appl Genet,1999,98:895-902.
  • 5Ferdinandez Y S N,Coulman B E.Evaluating genetic variation and relationships among two bromegrass species and their hybrid using RAPD and AFLP markers[J].Euphytica,2002,125:281-291.
  • 6Debener T,Mattiesch L.Construction of a genetic linkage map for roses using RAPD and AFLP markers[J].Theor Appl Genet,1999,99:891-899.
  • 7Remington D L,Whetten R W,Liu B H,et al.Construction of an AFLP genetic map with nearly complete genome coverage in pinus taeda[J].Theor Appl Genet,1999,98:1279-1292.
  • 8Cakraborty N,Bae J,Warnke S,et al.Linkage map construction in allotetraploid creeping bentgrass(Agrostis stolonifera)[J].Theor Appl Genet,2005,111:795-803.
  • 9Guthridge K M,Dupal M P,Kolliker R,et al.AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between popylations of perennial ryegrass(Lolium perenne)[J].Euphytica,2001,122:191-201.
  • 10周春玲,戴思兰.菊属部分植物的AFLP分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(5):71-75. 被引量:48

二级参考文献41

共引文献138

同被引文献104

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部