期刊文献+

评价不同的打分函数对虚拟筛选β-分泌酶抑制剂富集率的影响

Effect of different scoring functions on enrichment factors of virtual screening for β-secretase inhibitors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究多种打分函数对计算机虚拟筛选β-分泌酶(β-secretase,BACE-1)抑制剂的影响。方法采用分子对接软件Surflex虚拟筛选了50个BACE-1的抑制剂和9950个无活性分子,同时应用5种打分函数对筛选的结果分别应用单个打分函数和多个打分函数组合得分排序。结果单独以Surflex_score一个函数抽提对接后的结合模式再进行打分排序后富集率为40,将Surflex_score和D_score两个函数组合后排序可获得48的富集率。结论组合多种不同的打分函数比单个打分函数打分能获得更多的活性化合物。 Objective To explore the impact of the different scoring functions on the enrichment factors of virtual screening for β-secretase(BACE-1)inhibitors. Methods Virtual screening of the database composed of 50 BACE-1 inhibitors and 9950 inactive compounds for BACE-1 inhibitors were performed using docking program of Surflex, the results were scored and ranked with different single scoring functions and combine scoring functions. Results The enrichment factor(1%) was 40 when using the single surflex_score, the enrichment factor (1%) was 48 when combining the surflex_score and D_score to rank. Conclusion We prefer combine scoring functions to single scoring function because it can obtain more active compounds.
出处 《解剖科学进展》 CAS 2010年第3期235-239,共5页 Progress of Anatomical Sciences
关键词 分子对接 虚拟筛选 BACE-1 打分函数 富集率 molecular docking virtual screening BACE-1 scoring functions enrichment factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Jorgensen WL.Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization[J].Ace Chem Res,2009,42(6):724-33.
  • 2Moitessier N,Englebienne P,Lee D,et al.Towards the development of universal,fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods:a long way to go[J].Br J Pharmacol,2008,153 (Suppl 1):S7-26.
  • 3Garcia-Sosa AT,Sild S,Maran U.Design of multi-binding-site inhibitors,ligand efficiency,and consensus screening of avian influenza H5N1 wild-type neuraminidase and of the oseltamivir-resistant H274Y variant[J].J Chem Inf Model,2008,48(10):2074-80.
  • 4Reddy MR,Erion MD.Calculation of relative binding free energy differences for fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors using the thermodynamic cycle perturbation approach[J].J Am Chem Soc,2001,123(26):6246-52.
  • 5Teramoto R,Fukunishi H.Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening[J].J Chem Inf Model,2008,48(2):288-95.
  • 6Yi Mok N,Chadwick J,Kellett KA,et al.Discovery of novel non-peptide inhibitors of BACE-1 using virtual high-throughput screening[J].Bioorg Med Chem Lett,2009,19(23):6770-4.
  • 7Jain AN.Surflex-Dock 2.1:robust performance from ligand energetic modeling,ring flexibility,and knowledge-based search[J].J Comput Aided Mol Des,2007,21(5):281-306.
  • 8Meng EC,Kuntz ID,Abraham DJ,et al.Evaluating docked complexes with the HINT exponential function and empirical atomic hydrophobicities[J].J Comput Aided Mol Des,1994,8(3):299-306.
  • 9Jones C,Willett P,Clen RC,et al.Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking[J].J Mol Biol,1997,267 (3):727-48.
  • 10Murra CW,Auton TR,Eldridge MD.Empirical scoring functions.II.The testing of an empirical scoring function for the prediction of ligand-receptor binding affinities and the use of Bayesian regression to improve the quality of the model[J].J Comput Aided Mol Des,1998,12(5):503-19.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部