期刊文献+

雌激素受体阴性乳腺癌中人表皮生长因子受体2与孕激素受体表达的关系 被引量:2

Association of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 and Progesterone Receptor Expression in the Estrogen-receptor Negative Breast Cancer Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究雌激素受体(ER)阴性的乳腺癌患者中人表皮生长因子受体2(Her-2)和孕激素受体(PR)表达的关系以及对预后的影响。方法对1180例乳腺癌患者进行回顾性分析,确立ER状态,将PR与Her-2表达的关系进行比较,综合p53和上皮性钙黏蛋白(E-cadherin)状态以及发病年龄、肿瘤直径、肿瘤部位、组织学分级、淋巴结转移状态、是否化疗之间的差异。对影响ER阴性乳腺癌患者无病生存率(DFS)的相关因素进行分析。结果三阴性乳腺癌96例,Her-2过表达乳腺癌164例,PR+/Her-2+10例,PR+/Her-2-28例。三阴性乳腺癌较Her-2过表达乳腺癌更容易发生淋巴结转移(P=0.034),并且三阴性乳腺癌中淋巴结转移≥10枚患者所占的比例(26.0%)明显大于Her-2过表达乳腺癌(12.2%)。三阴性乳腺癌中组织学分级为3级的患者比例明显高于Her-2过表达乳腺癌(P<0.0001)。三阴性乳腺癌和Her-2过表达乳腺癌的局部复发率和远处转移率的差异虽无统计学意义,但三阴性乳腺癌的无病生存期(61.85个月)明显短于Her-2过表达乳腺癌(78.69个月,P=0.047)。结论与Her-2过表达乳腺癌比较,三阴性乳腺癌的临床表现为侵袭性更强,患者的无病生存期更短,预后更差。 Objective We studied the clinicopathologic characteristics and disease - free survival (DFS) for estrogen receptor - negative( ER - ) breast cancer by comparing the status of human epidermal growth factor receptor -2( Her- 2) and progesterone reeeptor (PR). Methods ER - negative expression was identified from 1180 breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2007 in Chang- hai Hospital (Shanghai). We examined differences between triple - negative and Her -2 - overexpressing breast cancers in relation to p53 and E - cadherin status, age, tumor size, histological grading, lymph node metastasis and chemotherapy, as well as identified prognostic factors with regards to DFS. Results We identified cases of 96 (12.5%) triple -negative and 164 (21.3%) Her- 2 -overexpressing phenotypes,respectively. No significant difference in p53 or E -cadherin expression between the triple -negative and Her- 2 -overexpressing breast cancer was found ( P 〉 0.05 ). Women with triple negative breast cancer experienced more lymph node metastases (71.9% : 58.5% ,P =0.034), with the higher percentage of more than 10 lymph nodes metastases(26.0% )as compared with Her -2 - overexpressing breast cancer ( 12.2% , P = 0. 034). A higher percentage of histological grade 3 was identified in triple - negative (67.7%) than in Her - 2 - overexpressing breast cancer(42.1% ,P 〈 0. 0001 ). No significant difference in local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate or incidence of recurrence and metastasis between the two phenotypes was found (P 〉 0.05). However, significantly poorer 5 -year DFS was seen in patients with triple negative phenotype (61.85 months)than with Her- 2 -overexpressing phenotype (78.69 months,P =0.047). Conclusion Triple -negative breast cancers were more aggressive, and these women had poorer DFS comparing with Her - 2 - overexpressing ones.
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2010年第5期34-38,共5页 Journal of Medical Research
基金 2006年上海市科学技术委员会科技攻关计划(06DZ19505) 上海市重点学科建设项目资助(B905)
关键词 雌激素受体 孕激素受体 HER-2基因 乳腺肿瘤 预后 Estrogen receptor Progesterone receptor Her - 2 gene Breast neoplasms Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Pichon MF, Broet P, Magdelenat H, et al. Prognostic value of steroid receptors after long - term follow - up of 2257 operable breast cancers. Br J Cancer, 1996,73:1545-1551.
  • 2Fou|kes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO, et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003,95 : 1482 - 1485.
  • 3Rakha EA, El - Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple - negative breast cancer. Cancer, 2007, 109:25 - 32.
  • 4Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature, 2000,406:747 - 752.
  • 5Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, et al. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER) - negative, progesterone receptor (PR) - negative, and HER2 - negative invasive breast cancer, the so - called tri- ple - negative phenotype : a population - based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer, 2007, 109:1721 -1728.
  • 6Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13:2329 -2334.
  • 7Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. Triple - negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13:4429 -4434.
  • 8Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, et al. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res, 2005, 11:5678 -5685.
  • 9Liu H, Fan Q, Zhang Z, et al. Basal - HER2 phenotype shows poorer survival than basal - like phenotype in hormone receptor - negative invasive breast cancers. Hum Pathol, 2008, 39 : 167 - 174.
  • 10Tan DS, Marchio C, Jones RL, et al. Triple negative breast cancer: molecular profiling and prognostic impact in adjuvant anthracycline - treated patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2008,111:27 - 44.

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部