期刊文献+

声带息肉患者的嗓音声学分析与VHI的相关性研究 被引量:19

Correlation between Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and Voice Acoustic Analysis in Patients with Vocal Cord Polyps
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨嗓音声学分析与嗓音障碍指数(voice handicap index,VHI)用于嗓音质量评估的临床意义及其相关性,并进一步验证VHI的实用性。方法对35名声带息肉患者(患者组)及35名嗓音正常人(对照组)进行嗓音声学分析和VHI调查,嗓音声学分析指标包括振幅扰动商(amptitude perturbation quotient,APQ)、基频微扰(jitter)、振幅微扰(shimmer)、噪/谐比(NHR),VHI调查包括功能(F)、生理(P)、情感(E)三个范畴,记录三方面得分及总分(TVH)分值。结果患者组的APQ、jitter、shimmer、NHR均高于正常组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);患者组VHI的TVH平均值为43.32±4.66分,而正常组的平均值为12.51±1.88分,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。声带息肉患者嗓音声学分析参数与VHI之间无显著相关性。结论临床上不能以嗓音声学分析为标准来判断或推测声带息肉患者症状轻重;VHI可主观反映患者嗓音障碍程度。 Objective To study the relationship between voice acoustic analysis(VAA) and voice handicap index (VHI) in patients with vocal cord polyps,and to investigate the characteristic of the VHI. Methods 35 subjects with normal voice and 35 patients with vocal cord polyps underwent VHI, were tested by VAA. Results The parameters such as APQ,jitter,shimmer,NHR in patients with vocal cord polys were much higher than those in the normal voice group. The average score of VHI was 43.32±4.66, while the average score of the normal voice group was 12.51±1. 88. There was no correlation between VHI and VAA. Conclusion Since there is no correlation between VHI and VAA in patients with vocal cord polys. One can not speculate the VHI score by the voice acoustic analysis.
作者 高洁 屈季宁
出处 《听力学及言语疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期246-248,共3页 Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
关键词 声带息肉 嗓音声学分析 嗓音障碍指数 Vocal cord polyps Voice acoustic analysis Voice handicap index
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献39

  • 1韩仲明.嗓音声学检测分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2006,13(5):351-353. 被引量:32
  • 2Norman D, Hogikyan ND, Clark A,et al. A review of outcome measurements for voice disorders[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2002,126:562.
  • 3Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalsi C,et al. The voice Handicap Index(VHI):development and validation[J]. Am J Speech Lang Pathol,1997,6:66.
  • 4Hogikyan ND, Sethuraman G. Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life(V-RQOL)[J]. J Voice,1999,13:557.
  • 5Hsiung MW, Pai L, Wang HW. Correlation between voice handicap index and voice laboratory measurements in dysphonic patients[J].Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2002,259:9.
  • 6Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, et al. The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2004,261 : 429.
  • 7Morsomme D, Jamart J, Wery C, et al. Comparison between the GIRBAS scale and the acoustic and aerodynamic measures provided by EVA for the assessment of dysphonia following unilateral vocal fold paralysis[J]. Folia Phoniatricaet Logopaedica, 2001,53 : 317.
  • 8Yu P, Revis J, Wuyts FL, et al. Correlation of instrumental voice evaluation with perceptual voice analysis using a modified visual analog scale[J]. Folia Phoniatr Logop,2002,54:271.
  • 9Chan KM, Yiu EM. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation[J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res,2002,45:111.
  • 10Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, et al. Development and vail-dation of the voice handicap index-10 [J]. Laryngoscope, 2004,114:1549.

共引文献72

同被引文献204

引证文献19

二级引证文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部