期刊文献+

民事诉讼当事人的自我责任 被引量:50

Self—Liability of Party in Civil Procedure
原文传递
导出
摘要 民事诉讼当事人的自我责任是指当事人应当对其诉讼行为所引起的法律后果承担责任。当事人的自我责任是构建现代民事诉讼制度的重要的程序法原理。自我责任主要通过为当事人设定行为负担而具体化。民事实体法的意思自治原则、裁判事实的建构性、对抗与判定的程序结构、当事人的理性选择、法院裁判的可接受性为自我责任提供了学理上的依据。强调对当事人的程序保障是现代民事诉讼的时代特色,只有在为当事人提供充分程序保障的前提下,让当事人承担自我责任才具有正当性。 The party is one of the most important subjects in civil proceedings, and his or her act is closely interrelated to the process of civil proceedings and the outcome of judgment. Self--liability of party is one of the doctrines for constructing a modern civil procedure. The liability here means that a party should take the unfavorable outcome for his or her failing to undertake certain acts or failing to undertake these acts timely when certain acts are necessary to obtain favorable outcome. Self--liability is generally taken shape by imposing burden of act on the party. Since a party has the freedom to act or not in the litigation, in most cases conducting some litigious acts is only a kind of burden. Self--liability of the party is not only provided in the principles of the civil pro- cedural law, but also materialized in some concrete systems and legal norms constituting these systems. Principle of disposition, principle of debate, system of court mediation, and the open and close of most procedures reflect the doctrine of self--liability. The practice of self--liability in civil procedure has its profound reasons. The principle of will autonomy in civil substantive law, the character of constructiveness of adjudicative facts, the structure of procedure of adversary and judgment, the rational choice of parties, and the accepta- bility of judgment provide the theoretical basis for the principle of self--liability. The possibility of choice made by the party in certain circumstances is the precondition for the party to take self--liability. And the symmetry of the severity of legal consequences and the acts of the party should also be taken into consideration when sets the conditions for imposing self--li- ability. EmFhasis on procedural protection of parties is the era feature of modern civil procedure. Only under the condition of sufficient procedural protection provided by the courts can the party's self--liability has soundness. The procedural protection mainly includes three aspects. Firstly, the court should provide conditions for the party to conduct the procedural act. Secondly, the court should exhaust its duty of clarification. Lastly, the court should aid the party in evidence collecting when necessary.
作者 李浩
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期120-133,共14页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 民事诉讼 当事人 自我责任 程序保障 civil procedure, party, self--liability, procedural protection
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献15

  • 1张卫平.论民事诉讼中失权的正义性[J].法学研究,1999,21(6):37-46. 被引量:112
  • 2宋冰编.《读本:美国与德国的司法制度及司法程序》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1999年.第210页.
  • 3[日]中村英郎.《新民事诉讼法讲义》[M].法律出版社,2001年版.第209页.
  • 4黄松有.《民事诉讼证据司法解释的理解与适用》[M].中国法制出版社,2002年版.第177页,第233页.
  • 5江伟 孙邦清.《对我国举证时限制度确立的反思》[A].何家弘主编.《证据法学论坛》(第六卷)[C].中国检察出版社,2003年版.第102页.
  • 6[德]狄特·克罗林庚.《德国民事诉讼法律与实务》,刘汉富译[M].法律出版社,2000年版.第379页.
  • 7[德]尧厄尼希 周翠译.《民事诉讼法》(第27版)[M].法律出版社,2003年版.第155页,第157页.
  • 8.《最高人民法院民事诉讼证据规则(修改稿)》[Z].,2000年9月27日..
  • 9.《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据问题的规定(讨论修改稿)》[Z].,2001年7月6日..
  • 10.《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定(征求意见稿)》[Z].,2001年10月30日..

共引文献225

同被引文献644

引证文献50

二级引证文献381

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部