期刊文献+

后模仿时代文学的转化之力——从域限视角论伊瑟尔的批评理论 被引量:2

Wolfgang Iser's Critical Theory from the Perspective of Liminality
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以"域限"这一理论命题为焦点,系统探讨伊瑟尔的批评理论。以英伽顿、伽达默尔和瓦尔特.佩特为思想资源,伊瑟尔先后在文本与读者、文学虚构与想象、文化内与文化之间勾勒域限空间的轮廓并揭示其昭示、生成或承诺的创新力量。伊瑟尔的理论征兆了西方人文研究领域内一块新的陆地、一种不断变化求新的话语——以域限现象为批判对象的知识话语。 By focusing on the theoretical statement of 'liminality',this article gives a systematic mapping of Wolfgang Iser's critical theory. Intellectually indebted to Roman Ingarden,Hans-Georg Gadamer and Walter Pater,Iser successively delineates the contour of liminal space between text and reader,literary fiction and imagination as well as intraculturally and interculturally to reveal the energizing potential disclosed in,generated from and promised by the liminal space. Iserian critical theory foregrounds a new continent and a new discourse full of creativity in Western humanities studies-a discourse of knowledge with liminal phenomena as the object of critique.
作者 陶家俊
出处 《外国文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期147-155,共9页 Foreign Literature
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Derrida, Jacques. Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.
  • 2Donoghue, Denis. Walter Pater : Lover of Strange Souls. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995.
  • 3Fluck, Winfried. "The Search for Distance: Negation and Negativity in Wolfgang Iser's Literary Theory. " New Literary History. 31.1 (2000).
  • 4Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005.
  • 5Heidegger, Martin. Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1971.
  • 6Holub, Leon C. Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction. London: Methuen, 1984.
  • 7Ingarden, Roman. Ontology of Work Of Art : Musical Work, Picture, Arch., Film. Athens: Ohio UP, 1989.
  • 8Ingarden, Roman. The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1974.
  • 9Iser, Wolfgang. "The Significance of Fictionalizing." Anthropoetics. III. No. 2 (Fall 1997 / Winter 1998).
  • 10Iser, Wolfgang.Prospecting: From Reader Response to Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: the Johns Hopkins UP, 1993.

同被引文献10

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部