摘要
钱穆和余英时是中国现代章学诚学术思想研究的重要学者。他们分别以学术史发展的"每转益进"说和"内在理路"说为基本立场来考察章学诚学术思想,提出了章学诚学术思想是针砭经学、考证流弊和应对经学、考证挑战的产物。他们从上述基本立场和观点对章学诚"六经皆史"的内涵、基本问题及文史校雠等进行了系统研究。他们的研究既各具特色,又有共性和承继关系。他们建立在文化保守主义立场上的章学诚学术思想及清代学术思想研究具有某种典范意义。
In Modern China, Qian Mu and Yu Yingshi are leading scholars in the research on Zhang Xuecheng's academic thought. They studied Zhang Xuecheng's academic thought from the basic academic history position of Mei Zhuan Yi Jin (Improvement in creating new situation) and Inner Logic. Qian and Yu thought it was the result of criticizing the abuses of Textual Research and coping with Textual Research's challenge. With the views, they made a systematic study of Zhang's thoughts, such as connotation of LiuJing Jie Shi (Six Classics are all History), Wen Shi Jiao Chou (Emendation of Literature and History's). Their researches have not only their own characteristics but also common- ness and inheritance relationship. Their research with the position of Cultural Conservatism is an academic paradigm.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期92-101,共10页
Journal of Historical Science
关键词
钱穆
余英时
章学诚学术思想
比较研究
典范意义
Qian Mul Yu Yingshil Zhang Xuecheng's academic thought
comparative study' paradigm significance