期刊文献+

艺术的意向性与非意向性--扬·穆卡若夫斯基文艺符号学思想初探 被引量:1

Intentionality and Unintentionality in Art——A Tentative Study on the Literary Semiotics of Jan Mukarovsky
原文传递
导出
摘要 艺术的意向性与非意向性是穆卡若夫斯基思想发展后期的一对核心概念,前者直接源于现象学哲学,后者则是穆氏在前者基础上发展出的一个新概念。穆氏通过创造性地赋予这对概念以新的内涵,来对艺术作品本体进行了全新阐释。概而言之,艺术的意向性是艺术作品语义上的一种动态的统一性,而非意向性则是对这种统一性的一种抵制。前者根源于艺术作品的符号属性,后者则由艺术作品的"物"的属性所赋予。艺术作品之所以具有魅力在于它既是符号,又是"物"。 Intentionality and unintentionality in art is a pair of central conceptions in the last period of developments of Jan Mukarovsky's thought. The former came from Phenomenology, while the latter was a new conception derived from the former. Creatively giving new meanings to this pair of conceptions, Mukarovsky radically illustrated the ontology of art by means of this pair of conceptions. In a word, Intentionatity in art is the semanti- cally unity of art works, while the unintentionality is a kind of resistance to this unity. The former is rooted in the semiotic character of art, while the latter is given by the "thing" of art. The charm of art lies in this fact: It is not only a sign, but also a "thing" .
作者 朱涛
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期128-133,共6页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
关键词 艺术的意向性 非意向性 扬·穆卡若夫斯基 intentionality in art unintentionality Jan Mukarovsky
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1朱刚.伊瑟尔的批评之路[J].当代外国文学,2009,30(1):47-54. 被引量:8
  • 2Ян Мукаржовский "Искусство как семиологический факт",Ю М Лотман О М Малевич Ян Мукаржовский:Исслебованце ло зсмемцке ц меорцц цскуссмва《Искусство》,Москва.1994.cp.191.
  • 3佟景韩译.《艺术的意向性和非意向性》.
  • 4扬·穆卡若夫斯基.《艺术的意向性与非意向性》,佟景韩译,见[俄]波利亚科夫编.《结构一符号学文艺学--方法论体系和论争》,佟景韩译,文化艺术出版社1994年版,第150、150、150-151页.
  • 5Ян Мукаржовский,"О структрализме",Ю М Лотман О М Малевич Ян Мукаржовский:Исслебованце ло зсмемцке ц меорцц цскуссмва《Искусство》,Москва.1994.cp282.
  • 6Ян Мукаржовский,"Структрализм в эстетике и в науке о литературе".Ю М Лотман О М Малевич Ян Мукаржовский:Исслебованце ло зсмемцке ц меорцц цскуссмва《Искусство》,Москва.1994.cp.261.
  • 7Ян Мукаржовский "Искусство как семиологический факт",Ю М Лотман О М Малевич Ян Мукаржовский:Исслебованце ло зсмемцке ц меорцц цскуссмва《Искусство》,Москва.1994.cp.194.
  • 8Peter Steiner, "The Conceptual Basis of Prague Structuralism", Ladislav Matejka, eds., Sound, Sign and Meaning : Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle, The University of Michigan, 1978, p. 370.
  • 9扬·穆卡若大斯基.《艺术的意向性与非意向性》,佟景韩译,见[俄]波利亚科夫编.《结构-符号学文艺学--方法论体系和论争》,佟景韩译,文化艺术出版社1994年版,第171页.

二级参考文献25

  • 1周启超.理念上的“对接”与视界上的“超越”——什克洛夫斯基与穆卡若夫斯基的文论之比较[J].外国文学评论,2005(4):28-37. 被引量:2
  • 2Fluck, Winfried. “The Search for Distance: Negation and Negativity in Wolfgang Iser's Literary Theory.” New Literary History 31.1 (Winter 2000) : 178-80
  • 3Goldstein, Philip & James L. Machor eds. New Directions in American Reception Study. Oxford & New York: Oxford UP, 2008.
  • 4Leitch, Vincent, ed. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York & London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2001.
  • 5Winfried Fluck, “The Searchfor Distance: Negation and Negativity in Wolfgang Iser's Literary Theory,” New Literary History 31.1 (Winter 2000) : 178-80.
  • 6Wolfgang Iser, “Reader Response Criticismin Perspective,” Changes and Challenges : The Role of the Future University , ( Seoul : Hanyang UP, 1990).
  • 7Terry Eagleton, After Theory (NewYork: Basic Books, 2003) 38, 53.
  • 8Wolfgang Iser, “Reader Re-sponse Criticism in Perspective,” Changes and Challenges: The Role of the Future.
  • 9David H. Hiesch, The Deconstruction of Literature, Criticism after Auschwitz (Hanover & London: Brown UP, 1991 ) 143-45.
  • 10Winfried Fluck, “The SearCh for Dis-tance: Negation and Negativity in Wolfgang Iser's Literary Theory,” p. 177

共引文献7

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部