期刊文献+

SF-36中文版健康状况调查表评价鼻咽癌疗后长期存活者适用性研究 被引量:14

Feasibility of the Chinese version of SF-36 health survey questionaire in long-term survivors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 下载PDF阅读器目的 评价美国SF-36中文版健康状况调查表用于鼻咽癌疗后长期存活者的适用性.方法 85例鼻咽癌疗后长期存活者通过电话或信访方式完成评价,相关分析、信度分析和因子分析等统计方法用于评价SF-36中文版的信度和效度.结果 分半信度为0.92,各领域克朗巴赫系数α均〉0.7,说明信度较好且各领域间有较好区分度.每个条目跟相关领域的相关系数都达到或接近0.5,并且各条目与所属领域相关系数均高于该条目与其他领域的相关系数,说明量表有较好的内容效度和区分效度.量表共提取6个主成分,基本反映了量表8个领域,累计方差贡献率为71.4%.8个领域提取2个公共因子,解释73.3%变异.SF-36中文版判别效度较好,能区分鼻咽癌患者和正常人群的生存质量.结论 SF-36中文版易于完成,具有较好的信度和效度,可应用于鼻咽癌疗后长期存活者生存质量的评价. Objective To evaluate the reliability, validity and feasibility of the Chinese version of SF-36 health survey questionaire in long-term survivors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods A total of 85 long-term NPC survivors completed the Chinese version of SF-36 by either telephone or mail survey. Correlation analysis, reliability analysis and factor analysis were performed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The Chinese version of SF-36 was easy to complete. The split-half reliability was 0. 92 and the Cronbach's ct coefficient among domains were all above 0. 70, which showed good reliability and discrimination capacity among domains. All the correlation coefficients between each item and its domain achieved or approached 0. 5, which were greater than those between the item and other domains. These results demonstrated that the Chinese version of SF-36 had good content validity and discriminatory validity. Six principal components were extracted from the scale, which could basically represent eight domains. The cumulative variance was 71.4%. Two common factors were extracted from the eight domains, which accounted for 73.3% of the variance. The Chinese version of SF-36 was able to detect differences in the quality of life between NPC patients and healthy populations. Conclusions The Chinese version of SF-36 has good feasibility, reliability and validity in evaluating the quality of life in long-term NPC
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期201-204,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤/放射疗法 生存质量 SF-36中文版 Nasopharyngeal neoplasms/radiotherapy Quality of life Chinese version SF-36
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1WHO.The Development of the WHO Quality of Life Assessment Instrument.Geneva:WHO,1993.
  • 2Fallowfield L.Quality of life:a new perspective for cancer patients.Nat Rev Cancer,2002,2:873-879.
  • 3Ware JE,Shebourne CD.The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36):1.conseptual framework and item selection.Med Care,1992,30:473-483.
  • 4崔念基,卢泰祥,赵充,张恩罴.规范鼻咽癌外照射的建议[J].中国肿瘤,1999,8(4):181-183. 被引量:23
  • 5健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)中文版//方积乾,主编.生存质量测定方法及应用.北京:北京医科大学出版社,2000:263-294.
  • 6李宁秀,刘朝杰,李俊,任晓晖.四川省城乡居民SF-36评价参考值[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):43-47. 被引量:395
  • 7伍勇,胡伟汉,夏云飞,马骏,刘孟忠,崔念基.192例鼻咽癌放疗后无瘤生存患者的生存质量分析[J].癌症,2005,24(11):1376-1383. 被引量:22
  • 8古模发,杜玉忠,陈新林,黎建军,张华满,钟健波.鼻咽癌患者中SF-36量表的信度和效度的研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(18):1403-1405. 被引量:29
  • 9Chie WC,Hong RL,Lai CC,et al.Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35.Qual Life Res,2003,12:93-98.
  • 10Pow EH,Kwong DL,McMillan AS,et al.Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs.conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma:initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial,Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,66:981-991.

二级参考文献50

共引文献1029

同被引文献147

引证文献14

二级引证文献169

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部