期刊文献+

基于交互记忆系统的团队有效性模型研究 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着竞争的日益激烈,越来越多的组织依靠知识资产来差异化他们的产品和服务,交互记忆系统作为解释团队知识处理过程的变量,被认为可以提高团队绩效,而成为学者关注的焦点。在梳理以往交互记忆系统方面的相关文献资料基础上,借鉴以往的团队有效性模型,提出交互记忆系统影响团队有效性的模型,以期为后续的研究提供理论基础。
出处 《科技管理研究》 北大核心 2010年第10期191-193,共3页 Science and Technology Management Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1COHEN S G,BAILEY D R.What makes teams work:Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J].Journal of Management,1997,23:239-290.
  • 2DANIEL R I,JOHN R H,MICHAEL J.Teams in organizations:From input-process-output models to IMOI models[J].Annu.Rev.Psychol,2005,56:517-543.
  • 3B HOLLINGSHEAD.Communication,learning,and retrieval in transactive memory systems[J].Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1998,34:423-442.
  • 4MORELAND R L,MYASKOVSKY L.Explaining the performance benefits of group training:Transactive memory or improved communication?[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2000,82:117-133.
  • 5LIANG D W,MORELAND R L,ARGOTE L.Group versus individual training and group performance:The mediating role of transactive memory[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1995,21(4):384-393.
  • 6LEWIS K.Measuring transactive memory systems in the field:Scale development and validation[J] .Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88:587-604.
  • 7WEGNER D M.Transactive memory:A contemporary analysis of the group mind[C].In:B Mullen,G R Goethals (Eds.),Theories of group behavior.New York:Springer-Verlag,1987:185-208.
  • 8张钢,熊立.交互记忆系统与团队任务、成员异质性、团队绩效关系的实证研究[J].技术经济,2008,27(5):26-33. 被引量:21
  • 9BRANDON D P,HOLLINGSHEAD A B.Transactive memory systems in organizations:Matching tasks,expertise,and people[J].Organization Science,2004,15(6):633-644.
  • 10武欣,吴志明.国外团队有效性影响因素研究现状及发展趋势[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(1):47-50. 被引量:46

二级参考文献86

  • 1张志学,Paul S.Hempel,韩玉兰,邱静.高技术工作团队的交互记忆系统及其效果[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):271-280. 被引量:67
  • 2Cohen S G & Bailey, D R. What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of Management, 1997, 23(3) : 239-290.
  • 3Campion, M A, Medsker, G J & Higgs, A C. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1993, 46(4): 823-850.
  • 4Campion, M A, Papper, E M, & Medsker, G J. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1996, 49(2): 429-452.
  • 5Klimoski, R & Mohammed, S. Team mental model: construct of metaphor? [J]. Journal of Management, 1994, 20(2): 403-437.
  • 6Mathieu, J E, Heffner, T S, Goodwin, G F, Salas, E, & Cannon-Bowers, J A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(2): 273-283.
  • 7Lester, S W, Meglino, B M, Korsgaard, M A. The antecedents and consequences of group potency.- a longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(2): 352-368.
  • 8Pearee, C L, Gallagher, C A, & Ensley, M D. Confidence at group level of analysis: a longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2002,75(1), 115-119.
  • 9张钢,熊立.交互记忆系统研究回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):840-845. 被引量:36
  • 10Denison D R,Hart S L.Kahn J A.From chimneys to cross-functional teams:Developing and validating a diagnostic model.Academy of Management Journal,1996,39:1005 ~ 1023

共引文献140

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部