柯亨与罗尔斯政治哲学研究路径的差异——以《拯救正义与平等》和《正义论》为例

Discuss the Difference of Research Method of Political Philosphy between Cohen and Rawls——Take the Case of "Rescuing Justice and Equality" and "Theory of Justice"

柯亨与罗尔斯在政治哲学研究路径上有三个重大的差异:分析与综合、微观与宏观、现实与虚拟(理想)。除此之外,在研究柯亨政治哲学研究路径的时候,一定要把握他的哲学方法背后的三个"情结",即"赖尔情结"、"马克思情结"与"基督情结"。在分析罗尔斯政治哲学研究路径时,也要关注实用主义哲学以及康德哲学对他的影响。

There are three differences researth method of political philosphy between Cohen and Rawls： analysis and synthesize、microscopic and macroscopic、ideal（invented） and reality.Besides,when we discuss the Cohen＇s political philosphy research method,we must grasp three ＂complex＂ beyond the research method;When we discuss the Rawls＇s political philosphy research method,we must pay close attention to the influence on Rawls by pragmatic philosphy and the thought of Kant.