期刊文献+

阅读过程研究方法评述——回顾与展望 被引量:3

Research Methods for Reading Process Studies: Review and Prospect
原文传递
导出
摘要 阅读过程研究的常用方法包括实验室研究方法、口头报告法、误差分析法等。上述方法各有其特点、优势与不足。从理论基础、研究目标、生态效度等角度对这些方法进行对比分析和讨论,有助于了解阅读过程研究的发展趋势和未来研究方向。同时,对研究方法的综合认识有助于深化对阅读过程研究方法的客观认识和理性对待,并在阅读教学和研究中做出审慎而明智的判断。 Research methodology used in studies on reading processes consists of, among others, the chronometrical experimental methods, verbal protocol and miscue analysis. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. A comparison of these relevant methods from the perspectives of theoretical basis, research focus and ecological validity helps teachers and researchers understand better the possible trends in studies on reading processes. More importantly, an adequate awareness of research methods will help to develop sensible views on research findings and make more sound judgments in reading instructions.
机构地区 山东大学
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 2010年第3期82-88,共7页 Foreign Languages in China
关键词 阅读过程 研究方法 对比分析 回顾与展望 reading process research methods comparison and contrast review and prospect
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Afflerbach, P. Verbal reports and protocol analysis [A]. Methods of Literacy Research [C]. M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, E D. Pearson & R. Barr (eds). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002: 87-103.
  • 2Crowder, R. G. & R. K. Wagner. The Psychology of Reading (2nd ed) [M]. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • 3Davenport, M. R. Miscues, Not Mistakes: Reading Assessment in the Classroom [M]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2002.
  • 4Dombey, H. Revolutionary reading [J]. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2005(2): 209-221.
  • 5Ericsson, K. A. & H. A. Simon. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1993.
  • 6Flurkey, A. D., E. J. Paulson & K. S. Goodman. Scientific Realism in Studies of Reading [C]. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008.
  • 7Goodman, K. S. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game [J]. Journal of Reading Specialist, 1967 (4): 126-135.
  • 8Goodman, K. S. Ken Goodman on Reading [M]. Ontario: Scholastic Canada Ltd., 1996.
  • 9Goodman, K. S. Reading, writing, and written texts: A transactional sociopsycholinguistic view [A]. On the Revolution of Reading: The Selected Writings of Kenneth S. Goodman [C]. A. Flurkry & Xu J. (eds). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2003: 3-45.
  • 10Goodman, K. S. Making sense of written language: A lifelong journey [J]. Journal of Literacy Research, 2005 (1): 1-24.

二级参考文献87

共引文献24

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部