期刊文献+

两种新辅助化疗方案治疗进展期胃癌的成本-效果评价 被引量:3

A cost-effectiveness analysis of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy schemes for advanced gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价两种新辅助化疗方案治疗进展期胃癌所产生的经济学效果.方法 2006年1月至2009年3月我院收治的53例进展期胃癌患者分别接受氟尿嘧啶+多西他赛+奥沙利铂(A方案组)和FOLFOX4(B方案组)新辅助化疗,观察其疗效及不良反应,并运用药物经济学的成本-效果分析法对两种方案进行分析评价.结果 两种化疗方案的平均总成本分别为21 320.01元和17 158.50元;化疗有效率为57.14%(16/28)和52.00%(13/25)(P〉0.05);相应成本-效果比为373.12和329.97;总不良反应发生率为82.14%(23/28)和76.00%(19/25)(P〉0.05).以B方案为基准,增量成本-效果为809.63.结论 B方案是进展期胃癌新辅助化疗的较佳用药方案. Objective To explore the cost-effectiveness of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy schemes for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.Methods Fifty-three patients from Jan.2006 to Mar.2009 of advanced gastric cancer underwent the neoadjuvant chemotherapy of Docetaxel+Oxaliplatin+Fluorouracil(scheme A)and FOLFOX4 (scheme B),repectively.Therapeutic efficacy and adverse drug responses (ADRs) were observed.The pharmacoeconomics of cost- effectiveness analysis was performed on two schemes as well.Results The costs were RMB 21 320.01 yuan for scheme A and RMB 17 158.50 yuan for scheme B.The effective rates were 57.14%(16/28) in scheme A and 52.00%(13/25) in scheme B (P〉0.05),and the cost-effectiveness ratio were 373.12 and 329.97 per effective rate respectively.The ADRs rates were 82.14%(23/28) and 76.00%(19/25) (P〉0.05).The incremental cost- effectiveness ratio was 809.63 of scheme A as against scheme B.Conclusions The scheme B is a better neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.
出处 《中国综合临床》 2010年第4期356-358,共3页 Clinical Medicine of China
关键词 胃肿瘤 新辅助化疗 药物经济学 成本-效果评价 Gastric cancer Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Pharmacoeconomics Cost- effectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献36

共引文献864

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部