摘要
针对当前梁鹄研究中出现的分歧和误读,本文通过古今史地资料的整理、校勘,对其籍贯作了进一步考证,并对鸿都门学与梁鹄书法的关系作了重新认定和评估,明确指出,当前学界对鸿都门学性质和内容等诸多方面有虚夸倾向。汉代重儒轻技思想是梁鹄书法受到抨击的根本原因,同时剖析了梁鹄书法所代表的新兴文化趋势的发展和演变过程,揭示了梁鹄书法形成的社会历史根源。
According to the misunderstanding and difference in the research about Liang Hu,through organizing and proofreading the historic and geographic materials about this question,this thesis does further textual research about Liang's native place,as wellas does re-evaluation and re-cognization of the relationship between Liang Hu's calligraphy and Hong DuMen Xue(college in the East Han Dynasty for civilians),and points out clearly that current academic circle tendsto exaggerate in aspects about the nature and contentof this college.The thinking of emphasizing Confucious idea and looking down upon skills in the Han Dynastywas the essencial reason for Liang Hu's calligraphy being criticized.The developing and evolution processof the newly-rising cultural trend represented byLiang's calligraphy annouced the social and historicroot for the formation of his calligraphy.
出处
《南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计)》
北大核心
2010年第3期37-44,193,共8页
Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute:Fine Arts & Design
关键词
梁鹄
鸿都门学
书法
Liang Hu
Wu's
Hong Du Men Xue
calligraphy