期刊文献+

注射用头孢噻利治疗急性细菌感染的多中心双盲随机对照临床研究 被引量:5

A multicenter,double-blind,randomized controlled clinical trial of injectable cefoselis in the treatment of acute bacterial infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价国产注射用头孢噻利治疗急性细菌感染的临床疗效和安全性。方法采用多中心、双盲、随机、平行对照临床研究方法 ,选择急性呼吸系统和泌尿系统细菌感染患者。试验组应用注射用头孢噻利1~2g静脉滴注,每日2次;对照组应用注射用头孢吡肟1~2g静脉滴注,每日2次。疗程7~14d。结果本研究共完成病例241例,其中呼吸系统感染121例,泌尿系统感染120例。试验组痊愈率和有效率分别为60.2%和96.7%,对照组痊愈率和有效率分别为54.2%和94.9%,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组细菌清除率为94.4%,对照组细菌清除率为100%,清除率的组间差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组不良反应发生率为3.3%,对照组为5.1%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),未见严重不良反应。结论国产注射用头孢噻利治疗急性呼吸系统和泌尿系统细菌感染,临床疗效确切,安全性较好。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestic injectable cefoselis in the treatment of acute bacterial infections.Methods A multicenter double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Patients with acute respiratory or urinary tract bacterial infection were randomized into treatment group or control group. Patients in treatment group were treated with injectable cefoselis. The patients in control group were treated with injectable cefepime. Both drugs were administered intravenously at a dose of 1-2 g twice daily for 7-14 days. Results A total of 241 patients (121 with respiratory tract infections,120 with urinary tract infections) were enrolled and completed the trial.The cure rate and efficacy rate were 60.2% and 96.7% in treatment group,and 54.2% and 94.9% in control group,respectively. The bacterial eradication rates in treatment and control groups were 94.4% and 100% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). The incidence of adverse reaction was 3.3% in treatment group,and 5.1% in control group. There was also no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). No serious adverse reaction was reported. Conclusions Injectable cefoselis is effective and safe for the treatment of acute respiratory or urinary tract bacterial infections.
出处 《中国感染与化疗杂志》 CAS 2010年第3期172-175,共4页 Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
关键词 头孢噻利 头孢吡肟 细菌感染 随机对照研究 cefoselis cefepime bacterial infection randomized controlled trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1周宇麒,张天托.第4代广谱头孢菌素:头孢噻利研究进展[J].中国药房,2002,13(12):753-754. 被引量:33
  • 2黄朋勉,王磊,范小鹏,李江胜,陈立功,谢伟胜.硫酸头孢噻利的合成研究进展[J].精细化工中间体,2007,37(1):15-18. 被引量:3
  • 3Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ,Grecka P,Tsitsika A,et al.In-vitro activity of FK 037 (Cefoselis),a novel 4(th) generation cephalosporin,compared to cefepime and cefpirome on nosocomial staphylococci and gram-negative isolates[J].Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,2000,36(3):185-191.
  • 4Climo MW,Markowitz SM,Williams DS,et al.Comparison of the in-vitro and in-vivo efficacy of FK037,vancomycin,imipenem and nafcillin against staphylococcal species[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,1997,40(1):59-66.

二级参考文献44

  • 1张越,吴鹏程,董博芳,杜红霞.3-氯头孢烯酸的合成[J].精细化工,2005,22(2):156-157. 被引量:3
  • 2薛峰,居沈贵,姚虎卿.硫酸头孢噻利合成工艺研究[J].中国新药杂志,2005,14(3):322-324. 被引量:8
  • 3Martinez- Beltran J,Canton R, Linares J, et al. Multicentre comparative study on the antibacterial activity of FK- 037, a new parenteral cephalosporin[J].Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 1995, 14(3): 244.
  • 4Giamarellos- Bourboulis EJ, Grecka P, Tsitsika A, et al. In- vitro activity of FK 037(Cefoselis), a novel 4(th) generation cephalosporin, compared to cefepime and cefpirome on nosocomial staphylococci and gram- negative isolates[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2000, 36(3): 185.
  • 5Inoue K, Inoue E, Mitsuhashi S. In vitro antibacterial activities of FK037: a new parenteral cephalosporin[J]. Chemotherapy, 1995, 41(4): 257.
  • 6Climo MW, Markowitz SM, Williams DS, et al.Compari- son of the in- vitro and in- vivo efficacy of FK037, van- comycin, imipenem and nafcillin against staphylococcal specie[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1997, 40(1): 59.
  • 7Kato N, Kato H, Tanaka Y, et al.In vitro activity of FK037, a new parenteral cephalosporin, against anaerobic bacteria[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1993, 37(5): 957.
  • 8Fu KP, Foleno BD, Lafredo SC,et al.In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of FK037, a novel parenteral broad- spectrum cephalosporin[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1993, 37(2): 301.
  • 9Hanaki H, Hiramatsu K. Combination effect of teicopl- anin and various antibiotics against hetero- VRSA and VRSA[J]. Kansenshogaku Zasshi, 1999, 73(10): 1 048.
  • 10Houston AK, Jones RN.Post- antibiotic effect of FK- 037 and biapenem tested against five bacterial species[J]. J Chemother, 1994, 6(1): 12.

共引文献33

同被引文献44

  • 1张兴红.老年细菌性肺炎280例临床分析[J].中外健康文摘,2010,7(16):84-85.
  • 2Jones RN. Preliminary interpretive susceptibility testing cri teria for FK-037 with 30 microgram disks[J]. J Clin Microbi ol, 1994, 32(4):1104-1106.
  • 3松本佳巳,横田好子,若杉昌宏,他.Cefoselis老含扫各种注射用βテクタム系蘖に对する2000年度临床分离菌の感受性[J].PharmaMedica,2002,20(5):168-193.
  • 4Giamarellos-Bourbouli5 EJ, Greeka P, Tsitsika A, et al. lnvitro activity of FK 037 (Cefoselis), a novel 4th generation cephalosporin, compared to cefepime and cefpirome on noso comial staphylococci and gram-negative isolates [J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2000, 36(3) :185-191.
  • 5Kuriyama T, Karasawa T, Nakagawa K, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of major pathogens of orofacial odontogenic infections to 11 beta-lactarn antibiotics[J]. Oral Microbioi Immunol, 2002, 17(5):285-289.
  • 6Neu HC, Chin NX, Huang HB. In vitro activity and betalactamase stability of FK-037, a parenteral cephalosporin[J]. Antimierob Agents Chemother, 1993, 37 (3) : 566-573.
  • 7Climo MW, Markowitz SM, Williams DS, et al. Comparison of the in-vitro and iwvi'vo efficacy of FK037, vancomycin, imipenem and nafcillin against staphylococcal species[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1997, 40(1) :59-66.
  • 8Wise R, Andrews JM, Thornber D. The in-vitro activity of FK 037, a new broad spectrum injectable cephalosporin[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 1994, 34(5):629-637.
  • 9Hatano K, Wakai Y, Ikeda F, et al. therapeutic effect of 9lactam antibiotics on murine streptococcal pneumonia Relationship between MICs and therapeutic efficacies[J]. Chemotherapy, 2002, 50(7) : 415-421.
  • 10Matsumoto Y, Shiokawa A, Wakai Y, et al. Efficacy of cefoselis against mixed infection caused by penicillin-resistant Stretococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) and lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus in f uenzae ( BLNAR ) [J]. Chemotherapy, 2000, 48(7) :516-523.

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部