3OKEIL A M, TUNG C C. Effects of ductility on seis- mic response of piping systems and their implication on design and qualification [J]. Nuclear engineering and design, 1996, 166(1): 69-83.
4KULIKOV Y A, LOSKUTOV Y V, MAKSIMOV M A, et al. Numerical-experimental investigation of the elastic deformation of a polymeric pipeline under im- pact[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 2001, 42(2): 294-299.
5PARULEKAR Y M, REDDY G R, VAZE K K, et al. Passive control of seismic response of piping systems [J]. Journal of pressure vessel technology, 2006, 128 (3) : 364-369.
6SEMKE W H, BIBEL G D, JERATH S, et al. Effi- cient dynamic structural response modelling of bolted flange piping systems [J]. International journal of pressure vessels and piping, 2006, 83 (10) : 767-776.
7YANG J L, LU G Y, YU T X, et al. Experimental study and numerical simulation of pipe-on-pipe im- pact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(10) : 1259-1268.
