期刊文献+

分辨充分条件假言命题

Distinguish between the Hypothetical Propositions under Sufficient Conditions and the Compound Propositions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 形式逻辑教科书中关于充分条件假言命题的定义及其列举的某些例句,值得质疑。对形如"如果p,那么q"的命题,应以其前、后件本身是不是真值确定的命题为标准,划分成两类,充分条件假言命题只是其中一类。由此出发,加以辨析,求解由逻辑学教科书中"充分条件假言命题"定义而引出的有关问题。 It is worth questioning that the definition of a hypothetical proposition under sufficient con- ditions and some of its examples which are enumerated in the textbooks about formal logic. Those propositions whose formal structure look like "if p, then q" should be divided into two kinds, and the basis of division is whether the "p" and "q" are propositions, so that a hypothetical proposition under sufficient conditions belong only to the one subterm of division. Starting with this, this paper analyzes and solves some related questions by the definition of "hypothetical proposition under sufficient condi- tions".
作者 林昌时
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2010年第5期23-28,39,共7页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
关键词 实质蕴涵 严格蕴涵 充分条件 假言命题 essence implication strict implication sufficient condition hypothetical proposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1人民教育出版社中学数学室.数学:第一册(上)[M].2版.北京:人民教育出版社,2000.
  • 2中国人民大学哲学系逻辑教研室.形式逻辑[M].2版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1984.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部