期刊文献+

Coopdech管与双腔管在开胸术的应用及对术后声嘶喉痛的对比研究 被引量:14

A comparison study of effects on postoperative hoarseness and sore throat between Coopdech bronchial blocker and double-lumen tube used in thoracotomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较Coopdech支气管填塞管与双腔管在单肺通气应用的效果及对患者术后声嘶喉痛的影响。方法择期全麻下行食管癌根治术患者100例,ASAⅠ~Ⅲ级,随机分成C组和D组(n=50)。C组采用单腔气管导管(ID7.5~8.0)复合Coopdech支气管填塞管,D组采用双腔支气管导管(35F~37F)。观察气管插管时间、插管尝试次数、术中导管移位次数、支纤镜使用次数,插管前后血流动力学变化,单肺通气时术侧肺塌陷及术野暴露情况,患者术后声嘶喉痛发生率及严重程度。结果两组间相比插管时间C组比D组长,插管尝试次数、术中导管移位次数、支纤镜使用次数D组均比C组多,插管前后MAP、HR变化率D组均比C组高,单肺通气时肺塌陷D组比C组好,患者术后声嘶、喉痛总体发生率D组比C组高(P<0.05)。单肺时术野暴露情况及术后在PACU、1d、2d、3d、>3d时患者声嘶、喉痛组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 Coopdech支气管填塞管复合单腔管双肺阻隔效果确切,插管定位方便快捷,刺激小,可减少患者术后声嘶喉痛发生率,具有一定的临床应用前景。 Objective To compare the performance between Coopdech bronchial blocker and double-lumen tube in one-lung ventilation and their effects on postoperative hoarseness and sore throat. Methods One hundred patients scheduled for esophageal cancer radical operation under general anesthesia in the Sun-Yat Sen Cancer Center were selected and randomly divided into group C and group D. One-lung ventilation was achieved by Coopdech bronchial blocker combining with single-lumen endotracheal tube (ID7.5-8.0 group C) and double-lumen tube (35F-37F group D),respectively. The data related to intubation and positioning was recorded:intubation time,intubation attempts,times of tube displacement,times of bronchofiberscope used etc. The change rate of MAP and HR after intubation,lung collapse and surgical exposure of the operated field during one lung ventilation were observed. The incidence and severity of postoperative hoarseness and sore throat were assessed. Results Intubation time was significantly longer in group C than that in group D (P〈0.05),while intubation attempts,tube disposition,bronchofiberscope used were significantly more in group D than those in group C (P〈0.05). The change rate after intubation was significantly greater in group D than that in group C (P〈0.05). It revealed that lung collapse degree was significantly lower in group D (P=0.029),though the surgical field exposure showed no significant difference (P=0.596). The overall incidence of postoperative hoarseness and sore throat was higher in group D than that in group C (P〈0.05),while the severity showed no statistical difference between the two group in the PACU,24 h,48 h,72 h and more than 72 h after the operation (P〈0.05). Conclusion Coopdech bronchial blocker combining with single-lumen endotracheal tube used in one-lung ventilation can provide exact lung isolation effects,easy and quick intubation and positioning and can reduce postoperative hoarseness and sore throat. These provide prospect for clinical application.
出处 《广东医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期1103-1105,共3页 Guangdong Medical Journal
关键词 Coopdech支气管填塞管 双腔管 单肺通气 声嘶喉痛 Coopdech bronchial blocker double-lumen tube one-lung ventilation hoarseness and sore throat
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献37

  • 1李明星.双腔支气管导管选择[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(12):866-867. 被引量:22
  • 2陈洁,王平,钟泰迪.Univent管和双腔管用于单肺通气的比较[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2006,27(5):284-286. 被引量:19
  • 3胡毅平.胸科手术单肺通气及麻醉的若干进展[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(2):149-151. 被引量:5
  • 4韩梅,王多友,王俊科.单肺通气技术的研究现状[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2007,28(2):126-128. 被引量:21
  • 5Campos JH,Kernstine KH. A comparison of a left-sided Bron cho-Cath with the torque control blocker univent and the wireguided blocker. Anesth Analg,2003,96 ;283-289.
  • 6Roscoe A, Kanellakos GW, McRae K,et al. Pressures exerted by endobronchial devices. Anesth Analg, 2007,104: 655-658.
  • 7Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Kadoya T. Use of the univent bronchial blocker tube for unanticipated difficult endotracheal intubation [J]. Anesthesiology, 2000, 93 (2): 590-591.
  • 8Cohen E. Methods of lung separation [J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2002, 15(1): 69-78.
  • 9Klein U, Karazi W, Bloos F,et al. Role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in conjunction with the use of double-lumen tubes for thoracic anesthesia [J]. Anesthesiology, 1998, 88 (2): 346-350.
  • 10Campos J H, Hallam E A, Van Natta T, et al. Devices for lung isolation used by anesthesiologists with limited thoracic experience: comparison of double-lumen endotracheal tube, Univent torque control blocker, and Arndt wire-guided endobronchial blocker [J]. Anesthesiology, 2006, 104(2): 261-266.

共引文献41

同被引文献98

  • 1王伶俐,肖少华.双腔管法行单肺通气麻醉时临床常见的问题[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(8):2328-2329. 被引量:12
  • 2陈钊军,张传汉,王鹏,付向宁.支气管填塞气囊在成人单肺麻醉中的可行性研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(1):53-54. 被引量:14
  • 3陈洁,王平,钟泰迪.Univent管在单肺通气中的应用[J].浙江医学,2005,27(9):695-697. 被引量:5
  • 4韩梅,王多友,王俊科.单肺通气技术的研究现状[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2007,28(2):126-128. 被引量:21
  • 5Mc Mullen MC,Girling LG,Graham MR,et al. Biologi- cally vari-able ventilation improves oxygenation and re- spiratory mechanics during one-lung ventilation[J]. An esthesiology, 2006,105 ( 1 ) : 91-97.
  • 6Angie Ho CY,Chen CY, Yang MW, et al. Use of the Arndt Wire-guided endobronchial blocker via nasal for one-lung ventilation in patient with anticipated restrict ed mouth opening for esophagectomy[J]. Eur J Cardio thorac Surg,2005,28 : 174-175.
  • 7Knoll H, Ziegeler S, Schreiber JU, et al. Airway inju ries after one-lung ventilation: a comparison between double-lumen tube and endobronchial blocker: a ran domized, prospective,controlled trialEJ2. Anesthesiolo gy,2006,105(3) :471-477.
  • 8Sandberg WS. gndobronchial blocker dislodgement lea- ding to pulseless electrical activity[J]. Anesth Analg, 2005,100:1 728-1 730.
  • 9庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:475-487.
  • 10朱也森.困难气道的当代观点//曾因明,邓小明,主编.麻醉学新进展.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:253-266.

引证文献14

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部