期刊文献+

大股东监督、小股东“搭便车”及其利益保护 被引量:1

Large Shareholder Supervision,"Free-rider Problem"and Investor Protection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大股东利用控制权侵害小股东利益引起理论和实务界的广泛关注,但对大股东的监督努力关注不够。事实上,由于大股东通过监督努力提高了公司价值,所以既有的文献认为控制权私有收益等于大股东对小股东的侵害的思路有悖于控制权价值的实质。同时,大股东也存在利用自己的控股权优势进行侵害中小股东利益的自利行为,这是由于小股东"搭便车"使得大股东的监督成本得不到补偿所致。笔者通过理论和模型分析,认为要对大股东的监督努力给予合理的补偿,同时要利用法律等治理机制强化对投资者的保护,降低大股东存在的侵害问题,从而促进中国证券市场健康发展。 Large shareholders violating the interest of small shareholders has attracted the attention of the theoretical circle and the business circle. However the attention to the supervision effort of large shareholders is not enough. In fact, large shareholders improve the performance of companies by monitoring the managers. The existing literature holds that PBC is large shareholders violating the benefits of small shareholders, which is against the essence of controlling right. At the same time, the reason for the selfish behavior of large shareholders making use of their controlling right to violate the interest of small shareholders is that the cost of supervision of large shareholders is not compensated due to the "free - rider problem" of small shareholders. Through theoretical and model analysis the authors hold that reasonable compensation should be given to large shareholders, at the same time the protection of the interest of investors should be reenforced through law and other corporate governance mechanism and large shareholders' violation of the benefits of small shareholders should be reduced so that the securities market of China may develop healthily.
出处 《经济经纬》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期114-117,共4页 Economic Survey
关键词 控制权私有收益 大股东 监督 补偿 侵害 private benefits of control large shareholder supervision compensation violation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献31

  • 1刘峰,贺建刚,魏明海.控制权、业绩与利益输送——基于五粮液的案例研究[J].管理世界,2004,20(8):102-110. 被引量:321
  • 2田国强.现代经济学的基本分析框架与研究方法[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):113-125. 被引量:293
  • 3张维迎.所有制、治理结构及委托—代理关系———兼评崔之元和周其仁的一些观点[J].经济研究,1996,31(9):3-15. 被引量:1549
  • 4段亚林.论大股东股权滥用[D]..中国优秀博士论文文库[C].,2000..
  • 5Ernst Maug.large shareholders as monitors:Is there a trad-off between liquidity and control?Journal of Finance Vol LⅢ,No 1.February 1998,65-93
  • 6易宪容.2003:《公司治理在于保护中小投资者》,载郎咸平.《公司治理》(译者序),社会科学文献出版社.
  • 7Barclay, M,, and Holdemess, C,, 1989, "Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics, 25,371-395.
  • 8Barclay, M., and Holdemess, C,, 1992, "The Law and Large-block Trades", Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 265-294.
  • 9Bae, K., J, Kang, and Kim, J. , 2002, "Tunneling or Value Added? Evidence from Mergers by Korean Business Groups", Journal of Finance, 57, 2695-2740.
  • 10Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and Lang, L., 2002, "Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings",Journal of Finance, 57, 2741-2771.

共引文献205

同被引文献20

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部