期刊文献+

基于模糊逻辑方法的人误风险严重度识别 被引量:1

Fuzzy Logic-Based Approach for Identifying Criticality of Human Error Risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在系统的可靠性和安全评价中,不仅要关注硬件或软件失效引起的风险,而且要关注由人误引起的风险。本工作考虑人误可能对系统带来的风险,建立一种基于模糊逻辑方法的人误风险评价模型,识别人误风险的严重度及优先性。该方法不仅考虑人误概率,且将人误影响概率与后果严重度二因子整合到人误风险评价模型中,以满足概率风险评价的最终目的。同时,该方法能模拟系统复杂的行为历程,处理主观、模糊以及不确定的信息或知识,较传统的确定性分析方法更符合实际。通过实例说明了该方法的具体应用,表明该方法是可用的、可靠的、有价值的。 In the system reliability and safety assessment,the focuses are not only risk caused by hardware or software,but also risk caused by "human error".This paper considers the effects of risk of human error on system,and presents a new risk assessment model of human error based on fuzzy logic used to determine risk prioritization of human error.The method not only considers the human error probability,but also integrates the error-effect probability and consequence severity into the risk assessment model to satisfy the objective of probability safety assessment.At the same time,the method can model the complex system behavior to deal with subjective,vague and uncertain information or knowledge and it is more realistic than traditional method.A case example is presented to demonstrate the proposed approach.The results show that the method is practicable,reliable and valuable.
出处 《原子能科学技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期571-577,共7页 Atomic Energy Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70573043 70873040) 国防科研资助项目(Z012005A001)
关键词 模糊逻辑 人误 风险评价 fuzzy logic human error risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1TRAGER T A.Case study report on loss of safety system function events,AEOD/C504[R].Washington D.C.:US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1985.
  • 2SWAIN A D,GUTTMANN H E.Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications,NUREG/CR-1278[R].Washington D.C.:Sandia National Laboratories,1983.
  • 3WILLIAMS J C.Toward an improved evaluation tool for users of HEART[C] ∥Proceedings of the International Conference on Hazard Identification,Risk Analysis,Human Factors and Human Reliability Process Safety.Orlando:Chemical Centre for Process Studies (CCPS),1992:261-271.
  • 4HOLLNAGEL E.Cognitive reliability and error analysis method[M].Oxford(UK):Elsevier Science Ltd.,1998.
  • 5COOPER S E,RAMEY-SMITH A M,WREATHALL J.A technique for human error analysis,NUREG/CR-6350[R].Washington D.C.:USNRC,1996.
  • 6KLIR J,YUAN B.Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic:Theory and applications[M].New Jersey:Prentice Hall,1995.
  • 7BOWLES J B,PELAEZ C E.Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode,effects and criticality analysis[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1995,50:203-213.
  • 8YADAV O P,SINGH N,CHINNAM R B,et al.A fuzzy logic based approach to reliability improvement estimation during product development[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2003,80:63-74.
  • 9GUIMARAES A C F,LAPA C M F.Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on nuclear engineering systems[J].Applied Computing,2007,7:17-28.
  • 10KONSTANDINIDOU M,NIVOLIANITOU Z,KIRANOUDIS C,et al.A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2006,91:706-716.

共引文献21

同被引文献17

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部