胡语文献涉“龙”诸名考辨

The Study of "Longjia" in Non-Chinese Documents

文章从语言历史学的角度出发,利用胡语文献、汉文文献的对勘和历史语音演变规律,探讨于阗文书《甘州使臣向于阗王庭的报告》中的dūm、吐蕃文书《审定沙州蕃汉各族官吏位阶状》中《蕃汉对译词表》中lung rje、古代突厥文Terkhin碑中lum isi、回鹘文写本Or.8212-179中lawxan igi与汉文"龙家"或"龙王"的对音或意义关联。同时,文章也对龙家在第二突厥汗国时期、漠北回纥汗国时期、河西陷蕃时期、归义军初期、甘州回鹘早期的活动有所论及,并认为"龙家"一名的来源在一定程度上反映了西域诸族与中原的密切联系。

The article from the point that language and history combined, with the comparisons of Non-Chinese and Dunhuang Chinese literatures and the rules of historical phonetic evolvement, discusses the sound and meaning relations of the ＂düm＂ in Khotan documents ＂the Report of Ganzhou Envoy to Khotan Royal Court＂, the＂lung dot＂ in Tibetan document ＂Ratify the Grades of Tibetan-Chinese Bureaucracys in Shazhou＂,the ＂lung rje＂ in ＂Tibetan-Chinese Bilingual Vocabulary＂, the ＂lure 6isi＂ in old Turkic inscription Terkhin, the ＂lawxan ěigěi＂ in old Uighur document Or.8212-179 and Chinese ＂龙家＂ or ＂龙王＂. At the same time, the article also writes about the activities of＂longjia＂ during the second Turk kingdom,Mongolei Uighur kingdom,Tibet dominion Hexi, Guiyijun, Ganzhou Uighur period. I think：the origin about the name of ＂龙家＂ at a certain extent declares publicly the revering and centripetal force of the Toqar to the Middle Dynastic,also reflects the consanguineous rclation of Western region all nations and Chinese.