期刊文献+

中文版学习观量表的适用性

On the Appropriateness of Chinese Version of Beliefs about Learning Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对573名被试施测中文版学习观量表、学习策略量表和时间管理倾向量表。结果表明,中文版学习观量表的克伦巴赫α系数在0.61~0.71之间;学习观各维度和学习策略及时间管理倾向之间均存在显著的正相关(ps〈0.01);典型学习观分组在三类学习策略上的得分存在显著差异(ps〈0.001),中文版中学生学习观量表有较好的信度和效度。 The Chinese version of beliefs about learning scale, learning strategies scale and time management disposition invento- ry were completed by 573 participants. The results suggested that Cronbach's alpha coefficient of Chinese version of beliefs about learning scale was between 0. 61 and 0.71;there was positive correlation between subtests of beliefs about learning scale and learning strategies and time management disposition (ps〈0. 01) ;the score of typical beliefs about learning grouping across three types of learning strategies had significant differences(ps〈0. 001) ; Chinese version of Middle School Students' beliefs about learning scale had good reliability and validity.
出处 《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第4期44-47,共4页 Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划项目(08JAXLX008) 辽宁省教育厅高校科研项目(2009GH43)
关键词 学习观量表 信度 效度 beliefs about learning scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1张志杰,黄希庭,凤四海,邓麟.青少年时间管理倾向相关因素的研究[J].心理科学,2001,24(6):649-653. 被引量:236
  • 2刘志华,郭占基.初中生的学业成就动机、学习策略与学业成绩关系研究[J].心理科学,1993,16(4):198-204. 被引量:96
  • 3黄希庭,张志杰.论个人的时间管理倾向[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):516-518. 被引量:456
  • 4黄希庭,张志杰.青少年时间管理倾向量表的编制[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):338-343. 被引量:804
  • 5[1]Buehl M M. & Alexander P A. Beliefs About Academic Knowledge[J]. Educational Psychology Review, 2001,13(4) ,385 - 418.
  • 6[2]Hofer B K. & Pintrich P R. The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Besearch, 1997,67(1), 88 - 140.
  • 7[3]Paulsen M B. & Wells C T. Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students[J]. Research in Higher Education,1998,39(4) ,365 - 384.
  • 8[4]Hofer B K. Personal epistemology research: implications for learning and teaching[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology Review,2001,13(4),353 - 383.
  • 9[5]Kardash C M. & Howell K L. Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic - spocific beliefs on undergraduates' cognitive and strategic processing of dual- positional text[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology,2000,92(3), 524 - 535.
  • 10[6]Schommer M. Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990, 82(3),498- 504.

共引文献853

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部