美国的小班化教学实践、绩效分析及启示被引量：20

The Achievements Analysis and Enlightenment of the CSR Teaching Practice in America

下载PDF

导出

摘要美国的小班化教学起源于上个世纪70年代末,历经三十余年的发展变革,如今已经取得和较为显著的成效和较为丰富的理论和实践经验。尽管美国的小班化教学实践是伴随着理论研究同期推进,但其个别做法至今在教育界并没有达成广泛的共识,甚至引发了不少争议。研究美国小班化教学的实践,对其绩效进行必不可少的科学分析,有助于我们辩证科学地认识小班化教学的实践意义和现实意义,并对基于我国本土化色彩的小班化小学实践提供一定的借鉴。 The CSR Teaching Practice began from the late period of the 1970s in America.After above 30 years development and reform,a large quantity of outstanding achievements and practical experience has been made.Though the theorical sthdy began along with the CSR Teaching Practice simultaneously,yet lots of researchers and educational experts have been showing out differernt opinons from its very beginning,enen worse,there are still great disputes among them.By meaning of this essential study and scientific analysis,it is helpful for us to realize the practical significance and theorical significance of the CSR Teaching Practice.Meanwhile,it is also full of referernces to our CSR Teaching Practice in China.

作者孙来勤曹兰芹

机构地区东北师范大学农村教育研究所嘉祥县职业中等学校

出处《吉林师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 2010年第3期93-97,共5页 Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition

关键词美国小班化教学成效评估争议启示 the CSR Teaching Pracice in America the achievements analysis enlightment

分类号 G420 [文化科学—课程与教学论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1GENE V GLASS &MARY LEE SMITH.Meta-anlysis of Research on the Relationship of Class Size and Achievement.FarWest Laboratory for Educational Research and Development[R].The Class Size and Instruction Project.September 1978:9-10.
2Class Size:Counting Students Can Count.Essentional Information for Education Policy.Publisheed by American Educational Research Association[J].Fall 2003,Volume 1,Issue 2.1.
3Paula Egelson,Patrick Harman,Art Hood,C M Achilles.How Class Size Makes a Difference[M].The Regional Educational Laboratory at Serve.First Printing 2002.
4Bruce J Biddle,David C Berliner.What Research Says about Small Classes and their Effects[J].Policy Perspectives.12-13.
5George W Bohmstedt,Brian M Stecher.Class Size Reduction in California 1996-1998:Early Findings Signal Promise and Concerns[R].Report Summary.CRS Research Consortium.1999,06.7-11.
6Rrt Hood.A Parent's Guide to Class Size Reducation[D].Published by SERVE:Improving Learning through Reseach &Development.First Printing 2003,6-8.
7庞红卫.美国加利福尼亚州小班化教育改革的经验与教训[J].比较教育研究,2001,22(10):28-32. 被引量：4
8Tommy M Tomlinson.Class Size and Public Policy:Politics and Panaceas.Programs for the Improvement of Practice[M].March 1998:23-30.
9Charles L Thompson,Elizabeth K Cunningham.The Lesson of Class Size Reduction.First in America Special Report[R].NE Education Research Council.Octber 2001:6.
10Eric A Hanushek.The Evidence on Class Size.Occasional Paper Number 98-l.W Allen Institute of Political Economy University of Rocheester[R].February 1998:24-25.

二级参考文献8

1California CSR Research Consortium.Class Size Reduction in California:The 1996-97、1997-98、1998-99 Evaluation Findings[Z].
2California CSR Research Consortium.Class Size Reduction in California:The 1996-97、1997-98、1998-99 Evaluation Findings[Z].
3California CSR Research Consortium.Class Size Reduction in California:The 1996-97、1997-98、1998-99 Evaluation Findings[Z].
4California Legislative Analyst's Office.Class Size reduction[Z].1997-2-12.
5California Legislative Analyst's Office.Class Size reduction[Z].1997-2-12.
6Joan Mc Robbie,Jeremy D.Finn,Patrick Harman.Class size Reduction:Lessons Learned from Experience[Z].Policy Brief,1998,(12)、(13).
7Joan Mc Robbie,Jeremy D.Finn,Patrick Harman.Class size Reduction:Lessons Learned from Experience[Z].Policy Brief,1998,(12)、(13).
8Mostller.Sustained Inquiry in Education:Lessons from Skill Grouping and Class Size[Z].Harvard Educational Review,66(4):797-842.