期刊文献+

中国财政政策的“挤出效应”——基于1952~2008年中国年度数据的实证分析 被引量:42

"Crowding Out Effect" Of Fiscal Policy In China:An Empirical Analyses Based on the Annual Data of 1952~2008
原文传递
导出
摘要 "挤出效应"指政府购买支出的增加将会导致投资的下降,公共支出的增加将会"挤出"投资。在应对金融危机而采取扩张性财政政策的今天,对财政政策效果的研究是一个热点问题。本研究运用两个著名的模型:国家干预主义的凯恩斯模型和从微观经济主体利益最大化出发的拉姆齐模型,对政府购买支出与实际利率和投资之间的关系进行分析。两个模型都得出了政府购买支出与实际利率同方向变动,与投资反方向变动的结论,两者的差别在于传导机制不同和政策有无滞后效应。通过对1952—2008年中国宏观经济时间序列年度数据的实证分析,本研究发现,政府购买支出与名义利率有同期的、显著的正相关关系,与投资有同期的、显著的负相关关系;中国的财政政策具有同期的、显著的"挤出效应"。 Crowding out effect means that the increase of government purchase could result in the decrease Of private investment, so the expansion of public expenditure would crowd out private investment Meanwhile the government is usingexpansionary fiscal policy to deal with the financial crisis, so the study on the effect of fiscal policy is a hot issue. This study uses two famous medelS; country intervening based Keynesian Model and representative individual optimal based Ramsey Model, to analyze the relation of government purchase to real interest and private investment. Two models reach the same conclusion that government pur- chase is positive to real interest and negative to private investment, and the only discrepancies are the different transmission mechanisms and whether there is lagging effect. According to the analyses of China's macroeconomic time series annual data in 1952 -2008, this study reveals that, government purchase has a significantly positive and contemporary relation with nominal interest as well as a significantly negative and contemporary relation with private investment, which means that China's fiscal policy has a contemporary significant crowding out effect.
作者 张延
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期58-66,共9页 Journal of Financial Research
基金 教育部社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(08JZD0015)资助
关键词 挤出效应 政府购买支出 实际利率 投资 拉姆齐模型 crowding out effect, government purchase, real interest, investment, Ramse Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Bart., Robert J. , ( 1987), "Government Spending, Interest Rates, Prices, and Budget Deficits in the United Kingdom, 1701 - 1918. " Journal of Monetary Economics 20 ( September ) : 221 - 247.
  • 2Barro Robert J. ( 1974), "Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?" Journal of Political Economy 82 (November/December) : 1095 - 1117.
  • 3Bernheim, B. Douglas, Shleifer, Andrei, Summon, Lawrence H. , ( 1985), "The Strategic Bequest Motive", Journal of Political Economy 93 (December) :1045 - 1076.
  • 4Bernheim, B. Douglas, and Bagwell, Kyle, ( 1988 ), "Is Everything Normal?" Journal of Political Economy 96 (April) : 308 - 338.
  • 5Bernheim, B. Dougles, ( 1987 a), "Ricardian Equivalence: An Evaluation of Theory and Evidence", NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2:263 - 304.
  • 6Poterba, James M. and Summers, Lawrence H. , (1987), "Finite lifetimes and the effects of budget deficits on national saving", Journal of Monetary Economics 20 (September) : 369 - 391.
  • 7Romer , David ( 2006 ), Advanced Macroeconomics. New York : McGraw - HilL.
  • 8Barro, Robert J. , (1993), Macroeconomics, 4^th edition, New York: Wiley and Sons.
  • 9Tobin, James. (1980), Asset Accumulation and Economic Activity, Chicago: Univeisity of Chicago Press.
  • 10Hubbard, R. Glenn, and Judd, Kenneth L. , (1986), "Liquidity Constraints, Fiscal Policy, and Consumption", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 1, 1 - 50.

同被引文献683

引证文献42

二级引证文献255

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部