期刊文献+

公平感社会比较的参照对象选择研究述评 被引量:23

Referent Selection in Justice Studies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 员工的公平感取决于社会比较的参照对象,分析参照对象选择的规律是理解公平感形成机制的核心问题。首先对公平感社会比较参照对象的种类和特征、参照对象选择的稳定性等进行了介绍,然后分析了影响参照对象选择的动机、个人、环境和认知因素,最后重点分析了当前研究中存在的问题,比如采用问卷无法揭示员工参照对象选择真实的心理过程,并且提出在以后的研究中采用质的研究方法,探讨中国组织员工群体化参照对象等新思路。 Based on Adam's equity theory,it can be referred that employees' perception of justice is mainly depended on whom they compare with.Therefore,the referent selection is critical to understand the mechanism of justice formation.This review firstly made a brief introduction to the classification of referent and its characteristics,and discussed the stability of referent selection.And then,individual and situational factors that influence referent selection,such as demography,motivation,cognition and environment,were introduced.Finally,the limitations of previous studies were analyzed and future research orientations were given.It was suggested that in previous questionnaire studies,priming effect would exist and therefore misguiding the actual psychological process of referent selection.As the result,qualitative method would be a better way to understand and analyze referent selection.And it would be valuable to discuss the topic that Chinese employees prefer to compare with referent group rather than referent individual.
作者 周浩 龙立荣
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期948-954,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70671046 70871047) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助(2009SCU11099)
关键词 公平感 社会比较 参照对象 justice social comparison referent
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1李贵成.社会公平视角下的仇富问题探析[J].理论探索,2008(5):99-102. 被引量:8
  • 2张志学.中国人的分配正义观[J].中国社会心理学评论,2005,(3):157-190.
  • 3周浩,龙立荣.公平敏感性研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):702-707. 被引量:34
  • 4Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (2001). How do I know that's fair? A categorization approach to fairness judgments. In S Gilliland (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 35-61). CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • 5Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • 6Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2008) Old face, new places: equity theory in cross-cultural contexts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 29-50.
  • 7Collie, T., Bradley, G., & Sparks, B. A. (2002). Fair process revisited: differential effects of interactional and procedural justice in the presence of social comparison information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 545-555.
  • 8Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
  • 9Conner, D. S. (2003). Social comparison in virtual work environments: An examination of contemporary referent selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 133-147.
  • 10Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2002). Alliance constellations: a social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 445-456.

二级参考文献12

共引文献42

同被引文献433

引证文献23

二级引证文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部