期刊文献+

消费者态度的新认知:二元化的矛盾态度 被引量:35

New Understanding of Consumer Attitude:Dualistic Attitudinal Ambivalence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统态度的研究认为态度是一元化的,而矛盾性态度的研究则提出态度是二元化的,即对于同一事物正面和负面的评价可以同时存在。态度矛盾是一个普遍现象。社会心理学主要对一般性矛盾态度进行了研究,尚处于起步阶段。而消费者矛盾态度是营销学和社会心理学相交叉的一个新兴研究领域,其与一般性矛盾态度的差别是,后者相对稳定,而消费者矛盾态度相对不稳定,容易受到外部环境的影响,并对消费者购买行为产生显著的影响。 Consumer ambivalence is the simultaneous or sequential experience of conflicting emotional states to an attitudinal object,which is different from prior studies on bipolar attitude.Ambivalence is an ubiquitous phenomenon.However,interest in ambivalence as descriptive and explanatory construct,and empirical research on ambivalence are relatively rare in the domain of psychology and marketing.The differences between ambivalence of social psychology and consumer ambivalence occur in several aspects such as stability and changeability.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期987-996,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70972091 70672067)资助
关键词 态度矛盾性 消费者矛盾 态度强度 信息处理 attitudinal ambivalence consumer ambivalence attitude strength information processing
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1陈志霞,陈剑峰.矛盾态度的概念、测量及其相关因素[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(6):962-967. 被引量:26
  • 2陈剑峰,陈志霞.一般矛盾态度及其相关研究进展[J].心理科学,2009,32(1):220-222. 被引量:13
  • 3Aaker, J., Drolet, A., & Griffin, D. (2008). Recalling Mixed Emotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 268-278.
  • 4Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1421-1432.
  • 5Armitage, C. J., Povey, R., & Arden, M. A. (2003). Evidence for discontinuity patterns across the stages of change: A role for attitudinal ambivalence. Psychology and Health, 18, 373-386.
  • 6Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
  • 7Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (2002). Ambivalence and response amplification: A motivational perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1143-1152.
  • 8Bettman, L R., Lute, M. F., and Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187-217.
  • 9Breekler, S. J. (1994). A comparison of numerical indexes for measuring attitudinal ambivalence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 350-365.
  • 10Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J, A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition, Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.

二级参考文献42

  • 1Fiske S T. Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psyehology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2004
  • 2Cacioppo J T, & Berntson G G. Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 1994,115:401 423
  • 3Conner M, Sparks P. Ambivalence and attitudes. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M. European Review of Social Psychology. Vol. 12. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.2002
  • 4Maio G R, Esses V M, Bell D W. Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 2000, 32 (1): 58-70
  • 5Tompson M M, Zanna M P, Griffin D W. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In: Petty R E & Krosniek J A (Eds.). Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995
  • 6Jonas K, Broemer P, Diehl M. Attitudinal ambivalence. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M. European Review of Social Psychology. Vol. 11. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2000
  • 7Bell D W, Eeeses V M, and Maio G R. The utility of open- ended measures to assess intergroup ambivalence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 1996, 28 ( 1 ) : 12 - 18
  • 8Bargh J A, Chaiken S, Govender R et al. The generality of the automatic attitude aetivation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 62(6): 893-912
  • 9Bassili J N. Meta - judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The ease of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71: 637- 653
  • 10Armitage C J, & Conner M. Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000,26:1421 - 1432

共引文献32

同被引文献366

引证文献35

二级引证文献194

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部