摘要
目的：探讨老年股骨粗隆间骨折治疗方法及疗效。A-法：64例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者，随机分为DHS组、牵引组。DHS组采用DHS固定治疗34例；牵引组采用股骨髁上牵引治疗30例。结果：经x2检验P=0．85〉0．05，无显著性差异，DHS与股骨髁上牵引治疗优良率元明显差别；牵引组愈合时间短于DHS组；DHS组负重时间短于牵引组，但牵引组的髋内翻发生高于DHS组。结论：DHS系统和牵引治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效可靠，但各有利弊，临床应正确选择，达到愈合快，痛苦小，并发症少目的。
Objective ： To investigate the treatment of intertrechanteric fractures of the method and effect. Methods ： 64 elderly patients with intertrochantefic fractures were randomly divided into two groups DHS, traction group. DHS DHS fixation in the treatment group were 34 cases; traction group were distal femoral traction treatment for 30 cases. Results： x 2 test P = 0.85 ＆gt; 0.05, no significant difference, DHS and the distal femoral traction to treat fine was no significant difference; traction healing time shorter than the DHS group; DHS group loading time shorter than the traction group , but the traction group than DHS hip varus group. Conclusion： DHS system and traction of femoral intertrochanteric fracture reliable, but their advantages and disadvantages, Clinical should be the fight choice to achieve healing, pain, fewer complications purpose.
