摘要
目的：对米索前列醇与催产素两种引产药在引产中的应用情况进行对比分析.方法：选择我院140例足月或延期妊娠孕妇,采用阴道置米索前列醇引产80例,采用催产素引产60例进行比较.结果：米索前列醇组引产成功时间较短,操作简便,但宫缩过强,胎儿宫内窘迫发生率偏高;催产素组引产成功时间较长,操作复杂,但安全、可靠.结论：对于足月或延期妊娠孕妇,在排除胎儿、脐带、胎盘、胎位、羊水、产道异常的情况下,可以灵活应用催产素与米索前列醇引产.但引产一定要专人监护,做好随时处理紧急情况的准备工作.
Objective： To misoprostol and oxytoein induction of labor in the two kinds of induction drugs in the application were analyzed. Methods： 140 patients in our hospital or postpone pregnancy full-- term pregnant women, the use of vaginal misoprostol for labor induction 80 cases of home use of oxytocin induction of labor 60 cases for comparison. Results： The sueeess of labor induction misoprostol group shorter, easy to operate, but the contractions too strong, the high incidence of fetal distress; successful induction oxytocin group longer, complicated operation, but the safe and reliable. Conclusion： For the full--term or extension of pregnancy pregnant women, the exclusion of the fetus, umbilical cord, placenta, fetal position, amniotic fluid, birth canal exceptional circumstances can be flexible application of oxytocin induction of labor with misoprostol. But the induction must be someone monitoring, well ready to deal with emergency preparations.
关键词
米索前列醇
催产素
引产
对比分析
misoprostol, oxytocin,labor induction, comparative analysis
