摘要
目的：对氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾治疗小儿哮喘治疗方法的进行比较、探讨和研究.方法： 收集本院54例哮喘发作的儿童患者,并且进行随机分组,每组27例,两组均采用综合性的治疗方法.其中观察组在此基础上给予沙丁氨醇空压雾化吸入.结果： 两组患儿治疗后疗效间差异有显著性（P〈0.05）,其中观察组的小儿哮喘呼吸症状体征明显消失时间短于对照组（P〈0.05）.结论： 氧驱动雾化和空气压缩泵雾化吸入均是治疗小儿哮喘急性发作的有效方法,但氧驱动雾化吸入治疗效果优于空气压缩泵雾化吸入,并且在整个疗程上可提高哮喘患者.
Objective -- driven aerosol inhalation of oxygen and air compression pump fog treatment of pediatric asthma treatments compared to explore and research; Methods 54 cases of hospital patients with asthma of children, and were randomly divided into groups of 27 cases, two groups are an integrated treatment. On this basis, in which the observation group given Shading Air inhalation of ammonia alcohol; the results of the two groups after treatment efficacy in children there was significant difference between （ P 〈 0.05）, in which the observation group respiratory signs and symptoms of asthma in children apparently disappeared a short time, in the control group （P 〈 0.05） ; conclusions of oxygen--driven atomization, and air compressors are the inhalation treatment of pediatric acute attack of asthma an effective way, but the oxygen-- driven aerosol inhalation treatment is superior to aerosol inhalation of air compressors, and the Throughout the course of treatment can be increased in patients with asthma.
