期刊文献+

FLAG方案治疗小儿复发难治性急性白血病临床研究 被引量:8

Clinical study of FLAG regimen for children with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨FLAG方案(氟达拉滨,阿糖胞苷,粒细胞集落刺激因子)治疗小儿复发难治性急性白血病的疗效。方法采用FLAG方案[氟达拉滨30mg/(m^2·d)×5+阿糖胞苷2g/(m^2·d)×5d+粒细胞集落刺激因子5μg/(kg·d)]治疗21例2~13岁的小儿复发难治性急性白血病,其中急性非淋巴细胞性白血病(AML)15例,急性淋巴细胞性白血病(ALL)6例。首次复发(R1)后首选FLAG方案者8例,次选10例,原发难治2例,第三次缓解(CR3)后FLAG巩固治疗1例。结果 21例患儿中1例作为缓解后巩固治疗,1例因化疗后感染死亡而无法评估FLAG应用后缓解率;其他19例可评估患儿中9例(47%)获完全缓解(CR),3例(16%)部分缓解(PR),7例(37%)无效(NR),总有效率63%。其中AML CR率57%,ALL为20%;R1后首选FLAG方案者CR率为57%,次选为20%。应用FLAG后患儿中性粒细胞>0.5×10~9/L的中位时间为21(12~36)天,血小板>20×10~9/L的中位时间为19.4(13~30)天。21例患儿中18例合并感染(86%),除1例死亡外其余均得到有效控制,治疗相关死亡率为4.76%。FLAG治疗后7例患儿进行了造血干细胞移植治疗,目前2例无病存活,分别已移植后无病生存14个月和56个月,其他4例死于移植相关并发症,1例死于移植后复发。另外14例非移植患儿中1例因FLAG相关感染死亡,7例因NR而放弃治疗或合并感染死亡,FLAG治疗有效的6例患儿中2例放弃治疗,4例复发死亡。本组患儿FLAG治疗后中位生存时间5个月。结论 FLAG方案治疗小儿复发难治性白血病疗效肯定,毒副作用可以耐受;AML选择FLAG的疗效优于ALL;复发后首选FLAG治疗效果好于次选者。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of FLAG regimen in children with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia. Methods Totally 21 cases with relapsed or refractory leukemia ( 15 ALL, 6 AML) were enrolled in this study. Fludarabine 30mg/ ( m^2 · d) × 5d + cytosine arabinoside 2g/ ( m^2 ·d) × 5d + granulocyte - colony stimulating factor 5 μg/ ( kg ' d) × 5d were used as the FLAG regimen. The median age in this group was 7 ( range 2 - 13) years old. FLAG was chosed in 8 patients as the first line treatment and in 10 patients as the second-line regimen after leukemia relapse. Another 2 primary refractory and 1 CR3 ALL patients received FLAG also. Results Nineteen of the 21 patients were eligible for assessment. Nine (47%) and 3 (16%) patients achieved complete and partial remission with the overall response rate of 63%. 57% CR and 20% PR was obtained in AML and ALL and 57% and 20% CR was gotten as first and second line treatment after relapse, re- spectively. The median duration of ANC 〉0. 5 × 109/L was 21 ( 12 - 36) days and platelet 〉 20 × 10^9/L was 19. 4 ( 13 - 30) days. Eighteen of 21 patients (86%) suffered severe infection during the regimen and all resolved after active antibiotic except 1 died of infection. The treatment-related mortality was 4. 76% in this group. After achieving complete remission, 7 patients received allogeneic stem cell transplantation, 2 patients survived until the post transplant follow-up 14m and 56m; 4patients died of transplant-related complications and 1 died of post-transplant relapse. For the other 14 non-t^ansplant pa- tients, 1 died of infection during the FLAG regimen. Seven no-response cases died of giving up treatment or infection ; Among 6 CR or PR patients 2 gave up treatment after remission; g died of infection after relapse. Median survival was 5months in all cases. Conclusion FLAG seems to be a good choice and well tolerated in children with relapsed or refractory leukemia, es- pecially for patients with relapsed AML and treatment as a first line regimen.
出处 《癌症进展》 2010年第3期279-284,共6页 Oncology Progress
关键词 氟达拉宾 儿童 急性白血病 复发 难治 fludarabine children acute leukemia relapsed refractory
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1Rubnitz JE, Razzouk BI, Lensing S, et al. Prognostic factors and outcome of recurrence in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer, 2007, 109(1) : 157-163.
  • 2Nemecek ER, Gooley TA, Woolfrey AE, et al. Outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for children with advanced acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2004, 34(9) :799- 806.
  • 3Aladjidi N, Auvrignon A, Leblanc T, et al. Outcome in children with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after initial treatment with the French Leucemie Aique Myeloide Enfant (LAME) 89/91 protocol of the French Society of Pediatric Hematology and Immunology. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(23):4377-4385.
  • 4Gratwohl A, Brand R, Apperley J, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia in Europe 2006: transplant activity, long-term data and current results. An analysis by the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Haematologica, 2006, 91(4) :513-521.
  • 5Woods WG, Barnard DR, Alonzo TA, et al. Prospective study of 90 children requiring treatment for juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(2):434-440.
  • 6Abrahamsson J, Clausen N, Gustafsson G, et al. Improved outcome after relapse in children with acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol, 2007, 136(2) :229-236.
  • 7Woods WG, Neudorf S, Gold S, et al. A comparison of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and aggressive chemotherapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia in remission: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Blood, 2001, 97 (1) : 56- 62.
  • 8[1]Belhabri A, Thomas X, Wattel E, et al. All trans retinoic acid in combination with intermediate-dose cytarabine and idarubicin in patients with relapsed or refractory non promyelocytic acute myeloid leukemia: a phase Ⅱ randomized trial [J] . Hematol J,2002,3(1):49 -55.
  • 9[2]Carella AM, Carlier P, Pungolino E, et al. Idarubicin in combination with intermediate -dose cytarabine and VP-16 in the treatment of refractory or rapidly relapsed patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The GIMEMA Cooperative Group [J] .Leukemia, 1993, 7 (2): 196 - 199.
  • 10[3]Ozkaynak MF, Avramis Ⅵ, Carcich S, et al. Pharmacology of cytarabine given as a continuous infusion followed by mitoxantrone with and without amsacrine/etoposide as reinduction chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory pediatric acute myeloid leukemia [J].Med Pediatr Oncol, 1998, 31 (6): 475 -482.

共引文献16

同被引文献115

引证文献8

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部