期刊文献+

什么是“实验者的回归”论题——兼评柯林斯的科学观 被引量:1

What Is "The Experimenter’s Regress"——Collins’ View of Science
原文传递
导出
摘要 "实验者的回归"论题是柯林斯在追踪引力波案例时,发现在科学争论中存在的一种循环现象,构成其科学观的核心内容,也可看做是他对"归纳问题"的社会学解答。柯林斯在归纳出两种回归类型——是回归到实验结果,二是回归到基本信念的同时,指明了打破回归的两种路径——是实验"校准",二是社会磋商。该论题自提出以来,在学界产生了广泛的影响,也受到了褒贬不一的批评。该论题的提出,为更合理地理解科学提供了新的视角,促使我们回过头来对传统科学观进行重新反思,彰显了重建科学观的迫切性。 "The Experimenter’s Regress" topic is a circle which was developed by Harry Collins when he traced the case of gravitational wave.It is the central concept of his view of science,and it can also be viewed as "sociological resolution" of the problem of induction.Collins analyzed two types of regress:regress to result and regress to belief,and then indicated two approaches to breaking the regress:calibration and social consultation.This topic produced a wide range of academic influence,but received criticisms at the same time.However,this topic provides us with a new perspective for understanding science,and makes us to reflect on the traditional view of science,and then highlights the urgency of reconstructing the view of science.
作者 张帆
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期47-51,共5页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
关键词 实验者的回归 归纳问题 算法模型 文化适应模型 the experimenter’s regreas the problem of induction the algorithm model the model of cultural adaptation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Collins H. Changing Order[ M]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
  • 2Collins H. Scientific Evidence: A Common Sense Approach is Needed [ J ]. Expert Evidence, 1996 (4) : 157.
  • 3Kennefick D. Star Crushing: Theoretical Practice and the Theoreticians' Regress [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, 2000,30( 1 ) :5.
  • 4Radder H. Experimental Reproducibility and the Experimenters' Regress [ J ]. PSA : Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1992 (1) :67.
  • 5史蒂夫·夏平,西蒙·谢弗.利维坦与空气泵:霍布斯、玻意耳与实验生活[M].上海世纪出版集团,2008.
  • 6Caroline J S. Picart. Scientific Controversy as Farce: The Benveniste- Maddox Counter Trials [ J]. Social Studies of Science, 1994,24( 1 ) :22 - 23.
  • 7Tiles J E. Review:Experimental Evidence vs. Experimental Practice? [ J ]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1992,43 ( 1 ) : 101 - 102.
  • 8Perlman M. Golden Ears and Meter Readers: The Contest for Epistemie Authority in Audiophilia [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, 2004,34 ( 8 ) :783.
  • 9Culp S. Objectivity in Experimental Inquiry: Breaking Data - Technique Circles [ J ]. Philosophy of Science, 1995,62 ( 3 ) :439.
  • 10巴里·巴恩斯,大卫·布鲁尔,约翰·亨利.科学知识:一种社会学的分析[M].邢冬梅,蔡仲译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004.67,132.

共引文献18

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部