期刊文献+

电力系统受扰轨迹的差异度及其在参数识别中的应用 被引量:12

Difference Degree of Power System Disturbed Trajectories and Its Applications in Parameter Identification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 受扰轨迹完整地反映了模型及参数对系统动态行为的影响。基于稳定性机理,提出电力系统受扰轨迹的机理差异度。该指标值随动态行为差异的增大而增加;当且仅当该指标值为0时,2组受扰轨迹完全重合。据此,可量化不同动态行为的接近程度,用以校核模型,并通过灵敏度分析来识别参数。通过仿真,验证了该指标的有效性,揭示出多参数识别问题中普遍存在的本质多解现象,其解依赖于初值和迭代策略。强调必须以不同扰动作为激励,分别识别参数,并指出系统识别的困难大大超出现有的认识。 Disturbed trajectories fully reflect the effects on system dynamic behavior of both models and parameters.Based on the stability mechanism,a mechanism difference degree is proposed as an index of power system disturbed trajectories.The index increases as the difference of dynamic behaviors increases between two scenario trajectories.The two trajectories completely overlap if and only if the index is zero.Therefore,the proximity of the different dynamic behaviors can be quantified,which can be used to verify models and identify parameters through sensitivity analysis.The simulation studies show the efficiency of the index.An essential phenomenon of multi-solution in multi-parameter identification is revealed,so that the identification result depends on both the initial value and search strategy.Different excitation disturbances are required for parameter identification.This paper explores the complexity of system identification,which is far beyond existing knowledge.
出处 《电力系统自动化》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期1-7,47,共8页 Automation of Electric Power Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金重大项目(50595413) “十一五”国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2008BAA13B05) 国家电网公司科技项目(SGKJ[2008]&[2009])~~
关键词 机理差异度 系统动态 稳定裕度 灵敏度 参数识别 多解现象 复杂性 mechanism difference system dynamic stability margin sensitivity parameter identification multi-solution phenomenon complexity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1WALVE K. Modeling of power system components at severe disturbances// Proceedings of 1986 CIGRE: paper 38-48, August 27-September 4, 1986, Paris, France.
  • 2DMITRY N, CARSON W T, WILLIAM A M. Model validation for August 10, 1996 WSCC system outage. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1999, 14(3): 967-979.
  • 3PEREIRA L, UNDRILL J, KOSTEREV D, et al. A new thermal governor modeling approach in the WECC. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2003, 18(2): 819-829.
  • 4PEREIRA L, KOSTEREV D, MACKIN P, et al. An interim dynamic induction motor model for stability studies in the WSCC. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2002, 17(4): 1108 - 1115.
  • 5CHOI B K, CHIANG H D, LI Y H, et al. Measurement based dynamic load models: derivation, comparison, and validation. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2006, 21(3): 1276-1283.
  • 6徐伟,薛禹胜,陈实,葛斐,Zhaoyang DONG.从实测轨迹提取知识时的困难及展望[J].电力系统自动化,2009,33(15):1-7. 被引量:18
  • 7张恒旭,张宁,刘玉田.电力系统暂态稳定数字仿真有效性评价[J].电力自动化设备,2007,27(7):13-16. 被引量:9
  • 8CRAVEN R, GEORGE T, PRICE G, et al. Validation of dynamic modeling methods against power system response to small and large disturbances// Proceedings of 1994 CIGRE: paper 38 302, August 28-September 3, 1994, Paris, France.
  • 9高松,贺仁睦,马进,张进.电力系统动态仿真误差评定准则研究[J].电力系统自动化,2006,30(4):6-10. 被引量:39
  • 10XUE Y, XU T, LIU B, et al. Quantitative assessments for transient voltage security. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2000, 15(3): 1077- 1083.

二级参考文献100

共引文献102

同被引文献120

引证文献12

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部