期刊文献+

基于偏差的冲突证据融合的改进方法 被引量:1

Improvement of Fusion of Conflicting Evidence Based on Deviation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在Dempster-Shafer(D-S)证据理论中,传统D-S组合规则在证据高度冲突时存在失效问题,会产生与常理相悖的结论.为此,文中提出了一种改进的处理冲突证据的融合方法,即通过计算各证据到命题平均支持度的偏差,来检测和消除冲突证据,并对最后结果进行修正,以合成来自不同识别框架的证据.计算实验结果表明,该方法能有效处理冲突,得到符合实际的组合结果,相对于其他典型算法,该方法在收敛性和可靠性上有明显改进. In the Dempster-Shafer evidence theory,the traditional D-S evidence combination rule fails to identify the actual conditions with highly conflicting evidence,which may result in contradicting conclusions.In order to solve this problem,this paper proposes an improved algorithm for the fusion of conflicting evidence,which detects and eliminates the conflicting evidence by calculating the deviation from all evidence to the average support level of the proposition,and amends the results to combine the evidence from different recognition frameworks.Numerical results show that the proposed method can effectively deal with the conflicts and achieve accurate identification,and that it is prior to other typical algorithms in terms of convergence and reliability.
作者 张齐 刘群
出处 《华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期71-75,共5页 Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2007B030100001)
关键词 DEMPSTER-SHAFER证据理论 组合规则 冲突证据 融合模型 偏差 Dempster-Shafer evidence theory combination rule conflicting evidence fusion model deviation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献87

共引文献739

同被引文献12

  • 1Smets P,Kennes R. The transferable belief model[J].{H}Artificial Intelligence,1994,(02):191-234.
  • 2Yager R R. On the Dempster-Schafer framework and new combination rules[J].{H}Information Sciences,1987,(02):93-137.
  • 3Lefevre E,Colot O,Vannoorenberghe P. Belief function combination and conflict management[J].Information Fusion,2002,(02):149-162.
  • 4Haenni R. Are alternatives to Dempster's rule of combination real alternatives Comments on"about the belief function combination and the conflict management problem”[J].Information Fusion,2002,(04):237-239.
  • 5Murphy C K. Combining belief function when evidence conflicts[J].{H}Decision Support Systems,2000,(01):1-9.
  • 6Huynh V N,Nakamori Y,Ho T B. Multiple-attribute decision making under uncertainty:the evidential reasoning approach revisited[J].IEEE transactions on systems man and cybernetics part A:Systems and Humans,2006,(04):804-822.
  • 7Yeh J Y,Fu J C. Parallel adaptive simulated annealing for computer-aided measurement in functional MRI analysis[J].{H}Expert systems with application,2007,(03):706-715.
  • 8郭惠昕.基于模糊集的证据组合方法及其应用[J].控制与决策,2008,23(2):229-232. 被引量:10
  • 9郎风华,谷利泽,杨义先,钮心忻.一种基于均衡交补分担准则的证据组合新方法[J].电子学报,2009,37(1):95-100. 被引量:6
  • 10孙全,叶秀清,顾伟康.一种新的基于证据理论的合成公式[J].电子学报,2000,28(8):116-119. 被引量:440

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部