2Weigold W. G. Coronary CT Angiography: Insights Into Patient Preparation and Scanning[J]. Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology,2006,9(4) :205-209.
4[2]Hong C,Becker CR,Huber,et al.ECG-gated reconstructed mul-ti-detector row CT Coronary angiography:effect of varying trigger de-lay on image quality[J].Radiology,2001,220(3):712-717.
5[3]American heart association Committee Report.A reporting system on patients evaluated for Coronary artery disease[J].Circulation,1999,5l(1):7.
6[5]Giesler T,Baum V,Ropers D,et al.Nonivasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast enhanced multidetector Ct:influenee of rate on image quality and stenosis detection[J].AJR,2002,179(1):911-916.
7[8]Shimss,Kim Y,Lim SM,et al.Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedieation on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary an-giographp[J].AJR AmJ Roentgenol,2005,184(2):649-654.
8[10]Dewey M,Hoffmann H,Hamm B,et al.Multislice CT coronary angiography:effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of coronary arteries[J].Rofo,2006,178(1):600-604.
7Leschka S,Wildermuth S,Boehm T. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT:effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality[J].Radiology,2006.378-385.
8Weigold WG. Coronary CT angiography:insights into patient preparation and scanning[J].Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology,2006.205-209.
9Austen WG,Edwards JE,Frye RL. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease.Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease,Council on Cardiovascular Surgery,American Heart Association[J].Circulation,1975.5-40.
