摘要
在儒家系统内部,牟宗三判定朱熹的思想系统是别子为宗。牟宗三认为朱熹将道德的最高本体体会为"只存有不活动",在功夫上强调格物致知的顺取,是儒家发展的转向和歧出。这种判定活动深化了朱子学研究,但是这种判定标准割裂了儒家的内圣外王之道的一贯性。
Within the Confucianism,Mou Zongsan's ideological system to determine Zhu Xi was "Bie zi wei zong"(a thought about neo-Confucianism). He claimed that Zhu Xi's moral ontology was "existence, no activities" , which was a deviation from Confucian development. Mou Zongsan's determination on Zhu Xi had deepened the study of neo-Confucianism;however,it also had cut off the coherence within Confucianism.
出处
《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2010年第2期7-10,共4页
Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
基金
黑龙江省研究生创新科研项目(YJSCX2007-002HLJ)
关键词
牟宗三
朱熹
别子为宗
Mou Zongsan
Zhu Xi
"Bie zi wei zong" (a thought about neo-Confucianism)