摘要
说起来也许令人难以置信,去年下半年以来,中国互联网上争论最为激烈且热度经久不衰的焦点话题既不是高房价,也不是暴力拆迁,而是一个普通人看似几乎插不上嘴的专业科学问题:转基因水稻应不应该商业化?
同被引文献26
-
1柳鹏程.转基因水稻商业化问题研究[J].湖北社会科学,2006(1):105-107. 被引量:2
-
2扈燕.关于完善转基因食品相关法律制度的构想[J].经济论坛,2006(19):130-131. 被引量:1
-
3刘志强,王成栋,李宁,张佳荣,张可炜.济南市消费者对转基因食品的认知态度的调查与分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2007,9(1):52-58. 被引量:26
-
4Gray ,A. J. Ecology and government policies: The GM crop debate[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004,41.
-
5Irwin,A. The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the "new" scientific governance[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2006,36(2).
-
6Chadwick, R. Novel, natural, nutritious: Towards a philosophy of food[J]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 2000,100.
-
7Heller,C. Techne versus teehnoscienee: Divergent (and ambiguous) notions of food "quality" in the French debate over GM crops[J]. American Anthropologist, New Series, 2007,109 (4).
-
8Kurzer, P. , A. Cooper. Consumer activism, EU institutions and global markets:The struggle over biotech foods[J]. Journal of Public Policy, 2007, (27).
-
9Magnan,A. Refeudalizing the public sphere: "Manipulated publicity" in the Canadian debate on GM foods[J]. The Canadian Journal of Sociology ,2006,31(1).
-
10Freidberg,S. , L. Horowitz. Converging networks and clashing stories.. South Africa's agricultural bioteehnology debate[J]. Africa Today ,2004,51(1).
-
1孔祥智.农村的“三块地”改革应走市场化之路[J].农村经营管理,2015(4):35-35. 被引量:2
-
2陈凯.解决“暴力拆迁”还有两大门槛——解读《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》[J].民主与法制,2011(5):54-55. 被引量:2
-
3点击[J].新西部,2007(9):6-7.
-
4韩鲲.你的天赋,都是你的负担[J].高中生学习(作文素材与时评),2014(4):59-59.
-
5王学良.大数据时代的城市:城市规划不再“跟着感觉走”[J].留学生,2016,0(11):17-20.
-
6韩鲲.你的天斌,都是你的负担[J].领导科学,2014,0(20).
-
7丁善耘.论提升“老字号”品牌竞争力的基本对策[J].企业活力,2004(11):26-27. 被引量:9
-
8专家观点摘编[J].中国老区建设,2011(1):22-22.
-
9程白弟.蒋大姐[J].黄河之声,2013(13):90-90.
-
10王宁,易萱,刘娟娟,韩旭东.云计算:为我们带来什么[J].东西南北,2012(2):76-78.