期刊文献+

用于辩证分析的多方对话协议 被引量:1

Multilateral Dialogue Protocol for Dialectical Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在基于辩论的多agent系统研究中,agent之间的对话博弈一般是双方的,然而现实中的辩论却常常涉及到多方参与者,如何实现多agent系统的多方对话博弈是当前的研究热点之一。用于多方论据博弈的辩证分析模型(DAM-MAG)是一种借鉴中国武术擂台比武思想,将多方对话博弈转化为若干个双方对话博弈的理论模型。DAM-MAG的难点在于多方对话博弈协议的设计和实现。为此,基于该理论模型提出了一种多方对话博弈协议。该协议提供了通过双方对话博弈来解决多方对话博弈问题的方法,为解决多agent系统的多方对话博弈提供了新的途径。 In the research of argumentation based multi-agent system(MAS), to best knowledge, dialogue games are generally two-party protocol. However, argumentation in real world application usually involves more than two parties. The study on multilateral dialogue games in multi-agent system is one of current hotspots. Inspired by the idea of challenge on arena in Wushu(Chinese martial arts), dialectic analysis model for multilateral argument game (DAM-MAG) provides a theoretical model by translating a multilateral argument games into several two-party dia- logue games. Based on this model, this paper carries out a study on multilateral dialogue games and proposes a formal multilateral dialogue system, called MiDiS. The main contributions of the paper are twofold: A novel multilateral dialogue protocol for multilateral dialectical analysis is proposed; meanwhile a new approach for multilateral dialogue games in MAS is also provided.
出处 《计算机科学与探索》 CSCD 2010年第6期511-519,共9页 Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金No.70971134 90716015~~
关键词 多方论据博弈 对话博弈 辩证分析模型 多AGENT系统 多AGENT交互 multilateral argument game (MAG) dialogue games dialectic analysis model (DAM) multi-agent system (MAS) multi-agent communication (MAC)
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Johnson M W, MeBurney P, Parsons S. A mathematical model of dialog[J]. Elec Notes in Theor Comp Sci, 2005, 141(5): 33-48.
  • 2Yuan T, Moore D, Reed C, et al. Informal logic dialogue games in human-computer dialogue[J]. Knowledge Engineering Review, 2009, 26(3).
  • 3Karunatillake N C, Jennings N R, Rahwan I, et al. Dialogue games that agents play within a society[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2009,173(9/10): 935-981.
  • 4McBurney P, Parsons S. Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents [J]. Journal of Logic Language Inform, 2002, 11:315-334.
  • 5McBurney P, Parsons S. Dialogue games for agent argumentation[M]//Rahwan I, Simari G R. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. [S.l.]: Springer, 2009: 261-280.
  • 6Vreeswijk G A W, Prakken H. Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics[M]//OjedaAciego M, DeGuzman I P, Brewka G, et al. Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000, 1919: 239-253.
  • 7Dunne P E, Bench-Capon T J M. Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2003, 149(2): 221-250.
  • 8Prakken H. Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation[J]. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2005, 15: 1009-1040.
  • 9Prakken H. Formal systems for persuasion dialogue[J]. Knowledge Engineering Review, 2006, 21(2): 163-188.
  • 10Yuan T, Moore D, Grierson A. A human-computer dialogue system for educational debate, a computational dialectics approach[J]. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2008, 18: 3-26.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部