摘要
所谓证据自由,指在刑事诉讼中,法律及判例原则上不对证据形式作特别要求,犯罪事实可通过各种形式的证据予以证明。证据自由是各国刑事诉讼对证据资格的普遍设定,是现代刑事证据制度体系下刑事程序特质、刑罚效率追求及揭示案件真相的必然要求。但证据自由亦应遵守"权利保护"及"司法尊严"的正当性要求。我国刑事诉讼采用可采证据枚举模式,与刑事证据自由原则构成尖锐的矛盾,不符合现代证据制度的要求,理应作出修改,确立证据自由原则及其相应的保障体系。
The meaning of liberty of proof is that the law and the jurisprudence don't stipulate the form of proof in the criminal procedure,so the facts of crime can be proved by all kinds of proof.The liberty of proof is a common standard for the qualification of proof in criminal procedure in most of the countries.Meanwhile,the characteristics of modern criminal evidence system,the efficiency of criminal punishment and the revelation of the verity of crime all demand the liberty of proof.However,the liberty of proof should respect some legitimate principles such as 'protection of rights' and 'judicial dignity'.The Chinese criminal procedure law has enumerated all the forms of proof that might be adopted by the judges.This stipulation sharply contradicts with the principle of liberty of proof and opposes the modern evidence institution.So it's necessary to amend the actual stipulation in Chinese criminal procedure law,and to establish the liberty of proof as well as some protective systems concerned.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第6期39-46,共8页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词
证据自由
正当性限制
个人权利
司法尊严
自由心证
Liberty of Proof,Legitimate Limits,Individual Rights,Judicial Dignity,Free Evaluation of Evidence